What problem does it solve? Writing an effective conference paper rebuttal under time pressure is difficult: reviewers rarely change scores, concerns vary in type, and a poorly structured response wastes the one chance to influence the decision. This Skill turns raw reviews into a strategically organized rebuttal following proven academic practices. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Concern Classification: Categorizes every reviewer concern into five types (factual error, missing experiments, scope questions, presentation issues, fundamental technical concerns) with a tailored response strategy for each. - Structured Rebuttal Drafting: Produces per-reviewer Q/A responses with evidence, actual experimental results, and polite phrasing templates, plus a score summary table assessing which reviewers are likely to upgrade. - Confidential SPC/AC Comments: Drafts factual, non-emotional confidential comments when a reviewer has a provable misunderstanding, and suggests post-rebuttal discussion-period tactics. - Use Case: After receiving three reviews for a SIGMOD submission, paste the review text and get a complete rebuttal draft with categorized concerns, evidence-backed responses, and a confidential comment for the AC about a reviewer's factual error. ## Quick Start Paste your paper reviews or provide the reviews file path and ask the assistant to draft a rebuttal following the categorized response strategy.
