openclaw-pr-maintainer

Automate OpenClaw pull request review, triage, and closure workflows.

Updated Apr 24, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/frankhli843/gemmahermes --skill openclaw-pr-maintainer-frankhli843
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: openclaw-pr-maintainer
Source: https://github.com/frankhli843/gemmahermes/tree/main/.agents/skills/openclaw-pr-maintainer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/frankhli843/gemmahermes --skill openclaw-pr-maintainer-frankhli843

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Maintainer workflow for reviewing, triaging, preparing, closing, or landing OpenClaw pull requests and related issues. Use when Codex needs to validate bug-fix claims, search for related issues or PRs, apply or recommend close/reason labels, prepare GitHub comments safely, check review-thread follow-up, or perform maintainer-style PR decision making before merge or closure.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Triage guidance for issues and PRs, including label recommendations and close/reopen decisions.
  • Safety-conscious review process that enforces evidence and keeps comments professional and auditable.
  • Guided workflows for preparing, posting, and recording maintainer decisions before merges.

Quick Start

Describe the PR to initiate the maintainer workflow and guide triage and resolution.

Frequently Asked Questions about openclaw-pr-maintainer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate GitHub PR triage and labeling for multiple pull requests?

Automate GitHub PR triage by applying guided workflows that validate bug-fix claims, recommend labels, and enforce evidence collection across multiple pull requests to streamline maintainer decisions before merge or closure.

What is the safest way to prepare review comments before landing a GitHub pull request?

Preparing review comments safely involves a review process that enforces evidence collection, validates claims, and keeps comments professional and auditable before recording maintainer decisions on a pull request.

How do I validate bug-fix claims when reviewing an open pull request?

Validating bug-fix claims during PR review requires searching for related issues or PRs, collecting evidence, and applying safety checks to confirm the resolution before applying close or reason labels.

Can I automate close and reopen decisions for GitHub issues and pull requests?

Automating close and reopen decisions is supported through triage guidance that evaluates issue and PR states, recommends appropriate labels, and prepares follow-up actions within a GitHub maintenance context.

What is the best way to manage maintainer workflows for reviewing and closing pull requests?

Managing maintainer workflows involves guiding the triage, safety review, and resolution of pull requests by searching related issues, applying labels, and preparing professional comments before merging or closing.

When should I not use automated PR triage for GitHub pull requests?

Automated PR triage should not replace manual judgment when evaluating complex bug-fix claims that require deep contextual understanding beyond evidence collection, safety checks, and standard label recommendations.