openclaw-pr-maintainer

Automate review, triage, labeling, and merge readiness for OpenClaw pull requests.

Updated Jan 31, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/zyj18860969891-byte/openclaw-railway --skill openclaw-pr-maintainer-zyj18860969891-byte
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: openclaw-pr-maintainer
Source: https://github.com/zyj18860969891-byte/openclaw-railway/tree/main/.agents/skills/openclaw-pr-maintainer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/zyj18860969891-byte/openclaw-railway --skill openclaw-pr-maintainer-zyj18860969891-byte

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Maintainer workflows for reviewing, triaging, preparing, closing, or landing OpenClaw pull requests and related issues can be slow and error-prone. This Skill centralizes decision logic, standardizes labeling, and provides safe, reproducible guidance for maintainers.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automates reviewing, triaging, labeling, and commenting on PRs and issues to accelerate maintainers' response times.
  • Enforces evidence-based decision making by guiding users to attach repros, logs, or rationale before landing changes.
  • Use Case: A maintainer uses this Skill to triage a spike in PRs, apply appropriate labels, draft safe responses, and surface follow-up tasks.

Quick Start

Activate the skill to triage and label incoming PRs and issues with maintainer-safe, auto-generated comments.

Frequently Asked Questions about openclaw-pr-maintainer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate PR triage and labeling for GitHub pull requests?

Automate PR triage and labeling for GitHub pull requests by activating this Skill to generate maintainer-safe comments, apply standardized labels, and enforce evidence-based decision logic across the contribution lifecycle.

What is the best way to enforce safety and governance rules during code review?

Enforce safety and governance rules during code review by applying strict evidence requirements, automatic close-label guidance, and structured review hygiene checks before allowing any pull request merges.

Does this PR triage automation work with OpenClaw projects on GitHub?

Yes, this PR triage automation works specifically with GitHub-based OpenClaw projects, supporting labeling, comment drafting, and merge readiness checks across contribution lifecycles.

How do I draft safe maintainer responses for incoming issues and pull requests?

Draft safe maintainer responses for incoming issues and pull requests by using the Skill to generate standardized, reproducible comments that surface follow-up tasks and require attached evidence.

When should I not use automated code review for pull requests?

You should not use automated code review when a pull request lacks required evidence such as reproductions, logs, or rationale, as the Skill enforces strict safety rules to prevent unsafe merges.