openspec-explore

Guide open-ended discovery with prompts and visual diagrams.

5|Updated Jan 29, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/agentxm/axm --skill openspec-explore-agentxm
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: openspec-explore
Source: https://github.com/agentxm/axm/tree/main/.gemini/skills/openspec-explore
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/agentxm/axm --skill openspec-explore-agentxm

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Enter explore mode to think deeply, visualize freely, and follow the conversation wherever it goes to clarify requirements and surface interesting directions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Thinking partner: helps you explore ideas, investigate problems, and clarify requirements without implementing code.
  • Problem-space mapping: guides exploration of possible approaches, risks, and questions to ask in early discovery.
  • OpenSpec awareness: provides non-prescriptive prompts and visual diagrams to surface options and drive decision-making.

Quick Start

Describe a problem you want to explore and I will begin a guided thinking session.

Frequently Asked Questions about openspec-explore

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I clarify requirements and explore ideas before writing code?

To clarify requirements and explore ideas, use a thinking partner that guides problem-space mapping, surfaces risks, and provides visual diagrams to drive decision-making without writing implementation code.

What is problem-space mapping and when do I need it for codebase examination?

Problem-space mapping is the process of investigating possible approaches, risks, and questions during early discovery. You need it when examining a codebase to surface options and clarify open-ended requirements before implementation.

Can I use visual diagrams to investigate problems and surface risks during discovery?

Yes, you can use visual diagrams to investigate problems and surface risks during discovery. The thinking partner provides non-prescriptive prompts and visual outputs to map the problem space and drive decision-making.

What's the best way to map out possible approaches for an open-ended problem?

The best way to map out possible approaches for an open-ended problem is engaging a thinking partner that provides structured prompts, visualizes the problem space, and surfaces risks to guide your exploration and decision-making.

Does this thinking partner generate code or only provide non-implementation guidance?

The thinking partner provides only non-implementation guidance. It focuses on exploring ideas, investigating problems, and clarifying requirements without generating code, keeping the session strictly within open-ended discovery workflows.

When should I not use an exploration session for requirements clarification?

You should not use an exploration session when you need actual code implementation rather than discovery. This thinking partner is designed strictly for problem-space mapping, risk surfacing, and requirements clarification, not for writing or deploying code.