openspec-verify-change

To verify a change implementation against delta specs, trigger the verification process with the change name to validate code alignment with requirements, scenarios, and design decisions. The process generates a structured verification report highlighting CRITICAL, WARNING, and SUGGESTION issues with actionable recommendations for review before archiving.

Delta spec coverage validation is a structured verification process that checks whether implemented code aligns with associated delta specifications and tasks. It assesses completeness, correctness, and coherence across requirements and design decisions, producing a formal report with prioritized issues to ensure implementation matches artifacts before archiving.

You can check task completion mapping by running a verification process that validates implemented code against delta specifications and design decisions. The verification assesses completeness and coherence, generating a formal report that highlights CRITICAL, WARNING, and SUGGESTION issues with actionable recommendations to review before archiving the change.

Yes, you can generate a formal verification report by providing the change name and triggering the verification process. The report applies structured checks across requirements, scenarios, and design decisions, then outputs prioritized CRITICAL, WARNING, and SUGGESTION issues with actionable recommendations for teams to review before archiving.

Yes, verification works as a standalone process with no listed dependencies or components required. You provide the change name to trigger verification, which applies structured checks across requirements, scenarios, and design decisions to assess completeness, correctness, and coherence, generating a formal report with prioritized issues and actionable recommendations.

Change implementations fail correctness checks when the code does not align with associated delta specifications, tasks, or design decisions. The verification process applies structured checks to assess completeness, correctness, and coherence, generating a report that highlights specific CRITICAL, WARNING, and SUGGESTION issues with actionable recommendations to resolve discrepancies.