openwhisper-iteration-budget

Enforce a two-attempt limit on feature implementations before requiring structured research.

2|Updated Apr 22, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/jimmi-joensson/OpenWhisper --skill openwhisper-iteration-budget
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: openwhisper-iteration-budget
Source: https://github.com/jimmi-joensson/OpenWhisper/tree/main/.claude/skills/openwhisper-iteration-budget
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/jimmi-joensson/OpenWhisper --skill openwhisper-iteration-budget

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Iteration budget rule prevents thrashing by enforcing a hard limit of two code attempts for a misbehaving feature and directing researchers to perform structured inquiry before attempting a third change.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Enforces a two-attempt limit on feature implementations or bug fixes.
  • Requires explicit research steps (web search, canonical docs, and cited sources) before further changes.
  • Use Case: teams stuck in endless cycles of trial-and-error during platform integrations; apply to any feature fix that regresses after two attempts.

Quick Start

Pause after the second attempt and conduct formal research following the guidance before proceeding with any third change.

Frequently Asked Questions about openwhisper-iteration-budget

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I stop thrashing when a bug fix keeps regressing across multiple attempts?

To stop thrashing on a misbehaving feature, enforce an iteration budget that limits code changes to two attempts before requiring structured web research and cited canonical documentation for any further fixes.

What is the two-attempt iteration budget rule in software engineering?

The two-attempt iteration budget is a process rule that pauses feature implementation after two failed code attempts, requiring developers to conduct formal research and document rationale before resuming coding.

How do I apply structured research before attempting a third code fix?

To apply structured research before a third fix, pause coding after the second attempt and perform web searches, review canonical documentation, and cite sources to document the rationale before making further changes.

Does an iteration budget work for platform integrations stuck in trial-and-error cycles?

Yes, an iteration budget works for platform integrations by breaking endless trial-and-error cycles, enforcing a hard limit of two code attempts before requiring formal research into canonical docs and cited sources.

When should I mandate research before allowing further code changes?

You should mandate research before further code changes when a feature implementation or bug fix misbehaves after two explicit attempts, ensuring structured inquiry and documented rationale prevent development thrashing.

Why does my development team keep thrashing on misbehaving feature implementations?

Development teams thrash on misbehaving features when lacking an iteration budget, causing unstructured trial-and-error cycles instead of pausing after two attempts to conduct formal research and document rationale.