operations-advisory-board

Routes operations questions to expert perspectives or convenes multi-expert review panels.

187|12|Updated Jun 1, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Luyu2026/Skill-Bible --skill operations-advisory-board-luyu2026
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: operations-advisory-board
Source: https://github.com/Luyu2026/Skill-Bible/tree/main/general-operations-skills/operations-advisory-board
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Luyu2026/Skill-Bible --skill operations-advisory-board-luyu2026

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve? Operations work often stalls on judgment calls rather than execution: whether an activity is worth doing, which metrics to watch, or how to design a growth experiment. This Skill distills the reasoning frameworks of operations experts (Huang Youcan, Zhang Liang, Qu Hui) and classic books (The Light of Operations, Lean Analytics, Growth Hacker) into callable advisory perspectives, so you get structured judgment instead of generic advice. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Automatic Routing: Matches your question type (value judgment, system building, metric selection, content strategy, growth experiments) to the 1-2 most suitable expert or methodology perspectives, with a one-line rationale. - Multi-Expert Review Panel: Convenes 3 perspectives in parallel on ambiguous problems and produces a review memo covering consensus, disagreements, conditional conclusions, and blind spots. - Conditional Conclusions: Outputs "under condition A, follow perspective X" style guidance with a prebuilt disagreement map, rather than making the final decision for you. - Use Case: You are debating whether to invest in a content-driven retention campaign. Ask the advisory board, and it routes to Huang Youcan for value judgment and Lean Analytics for metric validation, or runs a full review panel if the question is ambiguous. ## Quick Start Ask the operations advisory board to review whether your planned operations activity is worth doing, pasting your problem, plan, or data.

Frequently Asked Questions about operations-advisory-board

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I get expert advice on an operations decision?▼

Describe your operations question, plan, or data and the advisory board routes it to the most suitable expert or methodology perspective. For ambiguous problems, it convenes a three-member review panel that outputs consensus, disagreements, and conditional conclusions.

What experts and methodologies does the operations advisory board include?▼

The roster covers three expert perspectives (Huang Youcan, Zhang Liang, Qu Hui) and three methodology frameworks (The Light of Operations, Lean Analytics, Growth Hacker). Each member has a defined lens and question types it handles best.

How does the multi-expert review panel work?▼

The panel calls three perspectives in parallel, each analyzing from its own lens, then merges results into a review memo. The memo lists consensus points, specific disagreements with root causes, conditional conclusions, and blind spots the board cannot cover.

Can the advisory board make the final operations decision for me?▼

No, it deliberately avoids making final decisions. It provides conditional conclusions stating which perspective to follow under which conditions, plus the key assumption to validate, leaving the final call to you.

What are the limitations of distilled expert perspectives?▼

The perspectives are snapshots distilled from public information, not real endorsements by the named individuals. They cannot judge cases lacking real user-provided data or domains beyond the experts' experience, and information is capped at each member's research timestamp.