opl-charter-authority-reviewer

Classify statement authority types and flag forbidden claims in OPL foundation materials.

8|5|Updated Apr 2, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/gaofeng21cn/one-person-lab --skill opl-charter-authority-reviewer
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: opl-charter-authority-reviewer
Source: https://github.com/gaofeng21cn/one-person-lab/tree/main/plugins/opl-foundation-skills/skills/opl-charter-authority-reviewer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/gaofeng21cn/one-person-lab --skill opl-charter-authority-reviewer

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill eliminates the risk of including incorrect authority claims, boundary drift, and unearned readiness statements in OPL foundation materials such as charters, ADRs, RFCs, and closeout reports, which can cause misalignment, invalid handoffs, or compliance gaps during framework development and operation.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Authority Boundary Validation: Identifies defects like ambiguous owner splits, second-truth risks, and forbidden claims (e.g., unearned readiness claims, fake owner receipts) in reviewed materials.
  • Statement Classification: Categorizes each statement as source truth, policy interpretation, candidate finding, owner answer, or other authority type to clarify decision rights.
  • Use Case: When drafting a new OPL framework ADR, use this Skill to review the proposed language to ensure it does not make unearned production readiness claims or duplicate existing policy source of truth.

Quick Start

Use the opl-charter-authority-reviewer skill to review the draft OPL charter for forbidden authority claims and boundary drift.

Frequently Asked Questions about opl-charter-authority-reviewer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I detect overclaimed production readiness in an ADR?

You can identify overclaims by classifying each statement in the ADR as source truth, policy interpretation, or candidate finding to clarify decision rights and flag forbidden unearned readiness claims.

What is an authority boundary defect in OPL charter review?

Authority boundary defects include ambiguous owner splits, second-truth risks, and forbidden claims like fake owner receipts, which cause invalid handoffs and compliance gaps in foundation materials.

How to review OPL charter policy wording for forbidden authority claims?

Apply OPL authority boundary rules to classify statement authority types, flag forbidden claims like unearned readiness statements, and provide corrective suggestions without modifying the source of truth or signing owner decisions.

How do I validate owner split definitions in foundation documents?

You validate owner split definitions by reviewing foundation materials to identify ambiguous splits, classify statement authority types, and enforce boundary rules that prevent misalignment and invalid handoffs.

When should I use an authority boundary check for RFC closeout reports?

Use an authority boundary check when preparing RFC closeout reports to identify second-truth risks, enforce OPL rules, and ensure handoff packages contain no unearned readiness claims before framework operation.