What problem does it solve?
This Skill solves the problem of unsubstantiated or inaccurate plan completion claims for long-running OPL projects such as research papers, grant proposals, and multi-stage deliverables, which often lead to missed gaps, unassigned blockers, and false assertions of readiness, release authority, or production status.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Evidence-Based Status Mapping: Maps every original plan item to done, partial, not_started, or blocked status using only fresh, matching evidence, without redefining the original plan scope.
- Claim-Evidence Alignment: Matches evidence classes to the type of claim being made (e.g., source docs for source changes, owner receipts for acceptance, runtime readback for production claims) to avoid mismatched proof.
- Gap and Blockers Tracking: Identifies gaps for incomplete items, assigns next owners, and flags forbidden unproven claims like release authority or production readiness.
- Use Case: For a research team closing out a 2-year grant project, use this Skill to audit every committed plan milestone against actual delivered artifacts, surface unassigned blockers, and prevent false claims that the grant is fully ready for submission.
Quick Start
Use the opl-completion-audit-writer skill to audit the final grant proposal plan against all delivered source files, test outputs, and owner receipts to generate a completion report with status, gaps, and next steps.