opl-completion-audit-writer

Audit OPL plan items against evidence to map completion statuses and flag blockers.

8|5|Updated Apr 2, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/gaofeng21cn/one-person-lab --skill opl-completion-audit-writer
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: opl-completion-audit-writer
Source: https://github.com/gaofeng21cn/one-person-lab/tree/main/plugins/opl-foundation-skills/skills/opl-completion-audit-writer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/gaofeng21cn/one-person-lab --skill opl-completion-audit-writer

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill solves the problem of unsubstantiated or inaccurate plan completion claims for long-running OPL projects such as research papers, grant proposals, and multi-stage deliverables, which often lead to missed gaps, unassigned blockers, and false assertions of readiness, release authority, or production status.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Evidence-Based Status Mapping: Maps every original plan item to done, partial, not_started, or blocked status using only fresh, matching evidence, without redefining the original plan scope.
  • Claim-Evidence Alignment: Matches evidence classes to the type of claim being made (e.g., source docs for source changes, owner receipts for acceptance, runtime readback for production claims) to avoid mismatched proof.
  • Gap and Blockers Tracking: Identifies gaps for incomplete items, assigns next owners, and flags forbidden unproven claims like release authority or production readiness.
  • Use Case: For a research team closing out a 2-year grant project, use this Skill to audit every committed plan milestone against actual delivered artifacts, surface unassigned blockers, and prevent false claims that the grant is fully ready for submission.

Quick Start

Use the opl-completion-audit-writer skill to audit the final grant proposal plan against all delivered source files, test outputs, and owner receipts to generate a completion report with status, gaps, and next steps.

Frequently Asked Questions about opl-completion-audit-writer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I verify grant proposal completion with evidence-based auditing?

Evidence-based plan completion auditing enforces mapping every original plan item to done, partial, not_started, or blocked status using only fresh, matching evidence to prevent unsubstantiated closeout claims and false readiness assertions.

What is evidence-based status mapping for multi-stage project closeout?

Evidence-based status mapping for multi-stage project closeout is the process of matching evidence classes to specific claim types, such as using runtime readback for production claims or source docs for source changes, to eliminate mismatched proof.

How do I audit a research paper plan against delivered artifacts?

To audit a research paper plan against delivered artifacts, map original committed milestones to their completion status, identify gaps for incomplete items, assign next owners, and flag any unassigned blockers preventing final submission.

Can I use completion auditing for patent package verification?

Yes, you can use completion auditing for patent package verification. The auditing process applies to full-plan, all-the-way, and closeout audits for patent packages to prevent false assertions of release authority or production status.

How do I flag unproven readiness claims during project closeout?

To flag unproven readiness claims during project closeout, audit the committed plan against actual delivered artifacts and evidence to identify gaps, assign next owners for blockers, and prevent false assertions of release authority.

When do I need evidence-mapping for plan closeout?

You need evidence-mapping for plan closeout when finalizing long-running OPL projects like research papers or grant proposals, ensuring no unsubstantiated closeout claims, unassigned blockers, or unproven readiness assertions slip through.