opl-owner-evidence-intake-reviewer

Review OPL owner evidence intake packets for classification errors and gaps.

8|5|Updated Apr 2, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/gaofeng21cn/one-person-lab --skill opl-owner-evidence-intake-reviewer
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: opl-owner-evidence-intake-reviewer
Source: https://github.com/gaofeng21cn/one-person-lab/tree/main/plugins/opl-foundation-skills/skills/opl-owner-evidence-intake-reviewer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/gaofeng21cn/one-person-lab --skill opl-owner-evidence-intake-reviewer

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Manual review of OPL owner evidence intake packets often leads to misclassified evidence, uncaught gaps, or unauthorized acceptance claims that violate process boundaries and cause routing errors for complex knowledge work deliverables.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Evidence Classification: Automatically group observed references by evidence class (owner ref, runtime ref, execution ref, source ref, provenance ref, or reviewer note) to standardize intake processing.
  • Gap & Issue Flagging: Identify evidence intake gaps, missing owner references, wrong evidence classes, ambiguous owner routes, or overclaimed acceptance candidates to catch problems before formal review.
  • Compliant Reviewer Notes: Prepare concise, boundary-aligned reviewer notes that specify what owners can accept, reject, or route back, without overstepping review authority.
  • Use Case: When a research team submits evidence for a grant proposal owner acceptance, this Skill reviews all submitted references, flags any missing provenance documentation, and drafts a clear route-back request for the team to address gaps before formal owner review.

Quick Start

Use the opl-owner-evidence-intake-reviewer skill to review the submitted owner evidence intake packet for the Q4 research grant proposal, flag any missing provenance references, and draft a compliant reviewer note with route-back instructions for the submission team.

Frequently Asked Questions about opl-owner-evidence-intake-reviewer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review owner evidence intake packets to identify classification errors and evidence gaps?

To review owner evidence intake packets, group observed references by evidence class and flag missing provenance documentation or wrong evidence classes to catch problems before formal owner review.

What is OPL owner evidence review and when do I need it for research grant proposals?

OPL owner evidence review validates acceptance candidates and verifies evidence class fit for complex knowledge work deliverables like grants, research papers, and patents prior to routing to owner surfaces.

How do I draft compliant reviewer notes for owner evidence intake without overstepping authority?

Draft concise reviewer notes specifying what owners can accept, reject, or route back while enforcing strict no-authority boundaries to prevent unauthorized signing of owner receipts or creation of typed blockers.

What are the limitations of automated evidence intake review for acceptance validation?

Automated evidence intake review cannot declare readiness claims, sign owner receipts, or create typed blockers, ensuring all review output complies with process constraints and prevents unauthorized acceptance.

Does the evidence review process work for patent submissions and academic research papers?

Yes, evidence review applies to complex knowledge work deliverables including patents, research papers, and grants, validating owner-chain evidence assessment and evidence class fit verification.