What problem does it solve? Teams often evaluate new opportunities with gut feelings instead of structured analysis, leading to inconsistent prioritization and poor resource allocation. This Skill provides a repeatable weighted scoring framework that turns subjective debates into documented, data-driven go/no-go decisions. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Weighted Scoring Rubric: Evaluates opportunities across six criteria (Market Size, Fit, Competition, Effort, Timeline, Risk) with configurable percentage weights totaling 100%. - Decision Thresholds: Maps total scores to clear recommendations: STRONG GO (8.0+), GO (6.5-7.9), CONDITIONAL (5.0-6.4), and NO GO (<5.0). - Comparison Matrix: Ranks multiple opportunities side by side so teams can prioritize a portfolio rather than judging ideas in isolation. - Use Case: A product team comparing four feature ideas scores each against the rubric, runs a sensitivity analysis on effort estimates, and documents the final decision like an Architecture Decision Record. ## Quick Start Score these three feature ideas using the opportunity scoring rubric and give me a go/no-go recommendation for each.
