oracle-prompt-design

Design Oracle prompts for code review with structured file attachments.

2|Updated Jul 9, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/koki3141/codex-global-skills --skill oracle-prompt-design
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: oracle-prompt-design
Source: https://github.com/koki3141/codex-global-skills/tree/main/oracle-prompt-design
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/koki3141/codex-global-skills --skill oracle-prompt-design

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill streamlines the process of creating comprehensive Oracle prompts, ensuring a structured approach to code review, debugging, and design critiques.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Prompt Design: Helps in crafting prompts for Oracle, ensuring they are detailed and contextually relevant.
  • Attachment Management: Offers guidance on which files to include or exclude to make Oracle reviews efficient and effective.
  • Use Case: Before running Oracle on a piece of code, this Skill helps you prepare the prompt and select the appropriate files, enhancing the review process.

Quick Start

To design a prompt for Oracle, use the 'oracle-prompt-design' skill to prepare a prompt and file attachments for a code review.

Frequently Asked Questions about oracle-prompt-design

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I prepare an effective prompt for code review and debugging?

Designing Oracle prompts for code review requires defining project context, framing specific questions, and establishing evidence attachment logic. This structured approach ensures contextual relevance and efficient validation by providing the necessary code and debugging data.

What files should I include when designing a prompt for design critique?

When designing a prompt for design critique, include files that provide direct evidence for the question asked while excluding irrelevant data. Proper attachment management ensures the review process remains efficient and focused on the specific design context.

Can I use this approach to structure prompts for second-model validation?

Yes, this approach structures prompts specifically for second-model validation by ensuring contextual relevance and structured data attachments. It guides you through defining project context and evidence attachment logic for effective automated validation.

Do I need to provide project context before generating a code review prompt?

Yes, providing user-defined project context is required before generating a prompt. The prompt design process depends on user-defined project context, specific question framing, and evidence attachment logic to ensure precise and contextually relevant automated reviews.

What is the best way to structure prompts for debugging complex code?

The best way to structure prompts for debugging complex code is to attach relevant evidence files and frame specific questions within the broader project context. This structured data attachment ensures the review model receives the precise information needed for effective debugging.