orchestrating-subagents

Define tiered role mapping and standardized subagent prompt contracts for AI coding workflows.

437|45|Updated Jan 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/ZaxbyHub/opencode-swarm --skill orchestrating-subagents
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: orchestrating-subagents
Source: https://github.com/ZaxbyHub/opencode-swarm/tree/main/.claude/skills/orchestrating-subagents
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ZaxbyHub/opencode-swarm --skill orchestrating-subagents

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill eliminates common inefficiencies and risks in AI coding workflows that use parallel subagents: wasted token costs from overlapping parallel work, weakened validation gates from underpowered reviewer or critic agents, and cluttered main context filled with raw subagent outputs that are hard to synthesize.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Tiered role mapping: Assigns the right model effort and agent type to each role (lightweight explorers for recall-bound tasks, high-effort fresh-context agents for precision-bound reviewer and critic roles) to balance cost and validation strength.
  • Fan-out discipline rules: Prevents overlapping parallel work, sets optimal agent counts per wave, and scales targeted follow-up waves instead of speculative large initial deployments.
  • Standardized subagent prompt contracts: Defines clear scope, deliverable structure, evidence requirements, and status labels for all delegation prompts to ensure consistent, usable returns.
  • Context hygiene and fallback rules: Keeps the main workflow thread clean, and provides clear fallback procedures when subagent tools are unavailable to avoid silently passing off self-review as independent review.
  • Use Case: When running a swarm-mode QA sweep or issue tracer, use this Skill to delegate low-cost explorer agents to map codebase areas, then route findings to independent high-effort reviewer and critic agents to catch errors without exceeding your token budget.

Quick Start

Use the orchestrating-subagents skill to delegate parallel lightweight explorer agents to map the codebase for the current reported issue, then send the collected findings to independent high-effort reviewer and critic agents for validation before implementing any fixes.

Frequently Asked Questions about orchestrating-subagents

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I prevent overlapping work and wasted tokens when running parallel AI coding agents?

To prevent overlapping work in parallel AI coding agents, apply fan-out discipline rules that set optimal agent counts per wave and scale targeted follow-ups instead of speculative large initial deployments. This approach eliminates wasted token costs from redundant parallel exploration.

What is the best way to structure prompts for subagent delegation in swarm-mode workflows?

The best way to structure subagent delegation prompts is to use standardized prompt contracts that define clear scope, deliverable structure, evidence requirements, and status labels. This ensures consistent, usable returns from specialized agents without cluttering the main context.

How do I balance token costs and validation strength when assigning roles in an AI agent swarm?

Balance token costs and validation strength by using tiered role mapping: assign lightweight explorer agents to recall-bound codebase mapping tasks, and route findings to high-effort fresh-context agents for precision-bound reviewer and critic roles to catch errors effectively.

Why does my main context thread become cluttered with raw outputs during parallel code review?

Main context threads become cluttered with raw outputs because of poor context hygiene during subagent delegation. Applying standardized prompt contracts and clean main context hygiene rules keeps raw subagent outputs isolated and synthesized before entering the main workflow.

What should I do if independent subagent tools are unavailable for my QA sweep?

If independent subagent tools are unavailable for a QA sweep, follow predefined fallback procedures to avoid silently passing off self-review as independent review. This ensures validation gates remain uncompromised even when parallel agent tools are inaccessible.

Can I use parallel exploration agents to map a codebase before routing findings to independent reviewers?

Yes, you can use parallel exploration agents to map codebase areas for a reported issue, then send the collected findings to independent high-effort reviewer and critic agents for validation. This coordinated approach catches errors without exceeding your token budget.