oss-forensics

To investigate an open source supply chain attack, you need structured evidence collection from local Git, GitHub API, Wayback Machine, and GH Archive. A multi-agent workflow correlates artifacts, forms testable hypotheses, and validates findings to produce a forensic report with an auditable chain of custody.

Recovering deleted commits and detecting force-pushes requires deterministic evidence collection from local Git history and GitHub API. By correlating artifacts from multiple sources, you can reconstruct repository integrity issues and document them in a final forensic report.

A chain of custody in OSS forensics tracks evidence handling and validation steps for repository investigations. You need it when investigating supply chain attacks, extracting IOCs, or recovering deleted commits to ensure accountable, reproducible conclusions in your final forensic report.

Yes, extracting IOCs from GitHub repositories uses deterministic evidence collection from the Wayback Machine and GH Archive. Applying a structured investigation framework validates findings against multiple sources before generating a comprehensive forensic report.

The best way to document repository integrity issues is applying a multi-agent investigation framework that enforces strict evidence handling. By collecting deterministic artifacts from Git, GitHub API, Wayback Machine, and GH Archive, you generate a reproducible forensic report with an auditable chain of custody.