oss-forensics

You can recover deleted commits after a force-push by correlating local git history with GitHub API data and archive snapshots. This cross-source validation reconstructs erased repository timelines to identify hidden content rewrites and supply chain compromise.

Git history forensics investigates open-source supply chain attacks by collecting and correlating evidence from local history, GitHub APIs, and passive enrichment sources. It detects contributor anomalies, force-push erasure, and dependency injection to produce defensible findings.

The best way to extract IOCs from a compromised GitHub repository is by using multi-source forensic investigation that captures structured evidence. This approach validates indicators of compromise against GitHub Archive events and local git history to ensure defensible reporting.

Yes, you can detect maintainer account takeover by correlating GitHub Archive events with local git history to identify contributor anomalies. Cross-source validation from these sources reconstructs suspicious activity timelines and validates takeover hypotheses.

Yes, supply chain compromise investigation requires an evidence store to capture findings and produce a structured forensic report. This enforces cross-source validation and citation-backed hypothesis analysis to generate defensible findings.

Investigating CI/CD abuse and malicious releases with git forensics is limited by the availability of local git history, GitHub API data, and archive snapshots. Without passive enrichment sources and cross-source validation, producing defensible findings for deleted content becomes difficult.