What problem does it solve? Maintainers of widely used open-source projects often earn almost nothing from sponsorship because their tier ladders, reward structures, and funding links are designed for goodwill rather than for how individuals and companies actually pay. This Skill turns a vague "how do I get funded" question into a concrete, deliverable sponsorship program. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Program design end to end: interviews the maintainer, tests whether sponsorship is even the right instrument versus employment, grants, or commercial revenue, then sketches and ranks candidate program shapes (visibility, gratitude, retainer, access) before pricing anything. - Tier ladder and reward engineering: builds separate individual and company tiers priced against real placement traffic, stress-tests every reward at ten times the sponsor count, and respects platform constraints like uneditable GitHub Sponsors prices and the $5,000 invoiced-sponsorship minimum. - Corporate lane and grants: runs outreach to dependent companies with a payable checklist (entity, tax form, numbered invoice), and qualifies grant programs like NLnet, Sovereign Tech Fund, and CZI EOSS against eligibility gates before any proposal is drafted. - Use Case: A maintainer with 900k monthly downloads and $35/month in sponsorship asks what is broken; the Skill audits FUNDING.yml, package funding metadata, and health signals, then builds a named outreach target list instead of rewriting page copy. ## Quick Start Ask the Skill to design a sponsorship program for your open-source project, stating your monthly funding goal and current sponsor setup.