output

Format AWS security audit query results into two-phase responses with evidence and findings.

Updated Feb 16, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/aurainfosec/cloud-review-automation-poc --skill output-aurainfosec
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: output
Source: https://github.com/aurainfosec/cloud-review-automation-poc/tree/main/skills/output
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/aurainfosec/cloud-review-automation-poc --skill output-aurainfosec

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

The output skill eliminates confusion and inconsistency in AWS security audit responses by enforcing a reliable, readable structure for every query result.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Two-Phase Response Formatting: Shows full CLI command outputs inline for the audit trail, then presents clean results after a mandatory separator.
  • Deterministic, Evidence-First Presentation: Ensures claims are tied to concrete command evidence and that findings include required fields like severity confirmation and confidence.
  • Strict Enumeration & Section Activation Rules: Prevents partial answers by requiring complete resource listing and omitting inactive sections to keep responses concise and accurate.
  • Use Case: For example, when a user asks “Which S3 buckets lack secure transport?” the skill formats inventory, findings, impact, recommendations, and confidence in a standardized way that a manager can quickly scan.

Quick Start

Ask an auditor question like “List the S3 buckets that do not have encryption enabled and show the evidence for each,” then use the output skill to format the response with the required Results section.

Frequently Asked Questions about output

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I format AWS security audit results into a manager-readable report?

To format AWS security audit results, this skill structures raw query outputs into a two-phase response with an audit trail and a clean manager-readable results section. It enforces mandatory separators and standardizes findings, impact, recommendations, and confidence fields for easy scanning.

What is the best way to ensure complete resource enumeration across multi-account AWS queries?

To ensure complete resource enumeration across multi-account AWS queries, this skill applies strict activation rules that prevent partial answers. It requires full resource listing within the structured output and omits inactive sections to keep the evidence reporting concise and accurate.

How do I structure evidence and risk scoring for policy validation findings?

To structure evidence and risk scoring for policy validation findings, this skill ties claims to concrete command evidence. It enforces deterministic, evidence-first presentation by requiring severity confirmation and confidence fields alongside structured findings for all policy and configuration workflows.

Does this output formatting approach work for compound AWS security queries?

Yes, this output formatting approach works for compound AWS security queries. It applies consistent two-phase response formatting across inventory, external probe, policy, configuration, compound, and general question workflows in both single- and multi-account modes.

Why does my AWS security audit response lack a clear separation between audit trails and results?

Your AWS security audit response lacks clear separation because it misses mandatory separators. This skill enforces a strict two-phase structure, showing full CLI command outputs inline for the audit trail, then presenting clean results after a mandatory separator.

Can I use this structured output formatter for single-account AWS security checks?

Yes, you can use this structured output formatter for single-account AWS security checks. It handles both single- and multi-account modes, applying consistent two-phase response rules and structured findings to ensure manager-readable results regardless of account scope.