overreliance

Gate LLM outputs by confidence and route high-stakes cases to human review.

20|Updated Feb 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/thejefflarson/soundcheck --skill overreliance
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: overreliance
Source: https://github.com/thejefflarson/soundcheck/tree/main/.claude/skills/overreliance
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/thejefflarson/soundcheck --skill overreliance

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

LLMs often generate outputs that users treat as ground truth. This skill prevents systems from acting on unverified model results by enforcing explicit gates, disclaimers, and human review when the stakes are high.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Gate on confidence and domain to ensure that risky outputs are routed to humans rather than returned raw.
  • Attach a clear "AI-generated — verify before acting" disclaimer to every returned content piece.
  • Audit-log all inputs, outputs, and confidence signals to enable full traceability and re-readability of decisions.
  • Use cases include code review decisions, UI-facing content, and automated pipelines where LLMS outputs could impact real-world actions.

Quick Start

Ask the AI to validate the current LLM output, apply a confidence gate, and route high-stakes results to human review before returning content.

Frequently Asked Questions about overreliance

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I enforce human review gates for LLM outputs in automated pipelines?

To prevent treating LLM output as ground truth, apply confidence gates and domain risk checks to route high-stakes cases to human review. This ensures automated systems do not execute critical actions based solely on unverified model results.

What is the best way to add an AI disclaimer to UI-facing content generated by LLMs?

The best way to add an AI disclaimer to UI-facing content is to automatically attach a mandatory "AI-generated — verify before acting" notice to every returned content piece. This ensures users are always aware that the output requires verification before use.

How do I audit log LLM inputs and outputs for traceability?

You can audit log LLM inputs and outputs for traceability by automatically recording all prompts, returned content, and confidence signals. This creates a full audit trail of automated decisions, enabling complete re-readability and review of model interactions.

Can I route code review decisions to human reviewers when LLM confidence is low?

Yes, you can route code review decisions to human reviewers when LLM confidence is low. By gating on confidence and domain risk, high-stakes code review outputs are intercepted and sent to humans rather than being returned as raw unverified decisions.

When should I not use automated LLM decision-making without human oversight?

You should not use automated LLM decision-making without human oversight in high-stakes scenarios where domain risk is high or model confidence is low. In these cases, outputs must be routed through human review gates to prevent acting on unverified results.