pair-programming-with-agent

Align AI-assisted pair programming with human-defined architecture and domain constraints.

Updated Mar 8, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/luyzkk/Anti-Vibe-Coding --skill pair-programming-with-agent
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: pair-programming-with-agent
Source: https://github.com/luyzkk/Anti-Vibe-Coding/tree/main/skills/pair-programming-with-agent
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/luyzkk/Anti-Vibe-Coding --skill pair-programming-with-agent

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Prevents “vibe coding” pair sessions where an AI agent over-engineers, takes the wrong path, or invents domain assumptions instead of executing within human-defined constraints.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Human–Agent Navigation Framework: Establishes a clear mental model (human as navigator, agent as pilot) to guide collaboration and when the human must take control.
  • Akita Capability Guardrails: Uses a “does well vs does badly” table to decide when to delegate tasks and when to require active human judgment.
  • Interruption Triggers with Corrective Phrases: Provides concrete stop conditions for over-engineering, off-plan work, insufficient context, and disguised architectural decisions.
  • Domain Context Injection Templates: Shows how to supply non-obvious, project-specific information (rules, workarounds, infra limits) before the agent proceeds.

Quick Start

Tell your agent: “Start implementing this task, but stop immediately if you propose premature abstractions or change the plan, and ask me for domain context before continuing.”

Frequently Asked Questions about pair-programming-with-agent

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I stop AI agents from over-engineering during pair programming?

To stop AI agents from over-engineering, define explicit interruption triggers and architecture guardrails before coding. Establish a human-navigator, agent-pilot model where the agent stops immediately upon proposing premature abstractions or off-plan work.

How do I inject domain context into AI coding sessions?

Inject domain context into AI coding sessions using structured templates that supply non-obvious business rules, infrastructure limitations, and compliance constraints. This prevents the agent from inventing assumptions and forces it to ask for context before proceeding.

When should I take control from an AI coding agent?

You should take control from an AI coding agent when it hits disguised architectural decisions, lacks sufficient context, or attempts non-obvious business rule implementations. Use capability-based delegation boundaries to determine when active human judgment is required.

Can I use TDD with an AI pair programming agent?

You can use TDD with an AI pair programming agent by applying capability guardrails to delegate test generation and refactoring. Maintain a does-well versus does-badly boundary table to ensure the agent executes tests within human-defined constraints.

What is the best way to align AI generated code with real domain truth?

The best way to align AI generated code with domain truth is enforcing structured domain context injection and explicit interruption criteria. This keeps the agent anchored to actual infrastructure limitations and business rules instead of vibe coding.

How do I prevent vibe coding when pair programming with an AI agent?

Prevent vibe coding by implementing a human-agent navigation framework with strict capability guardrails. Supply structured domain context and enforce stop conditions for over-engineering to ensure the agent executes within human-defined constraints.