panel-majority-vote

To reach a consensus verdict, you can use a panel-majority-vote mechanism that runs three isolated reviewer subagents in parallel. It consolidates their independent outputs into a final PASS or BLOCK decision based on a 2/3 majority agreement.

An isolated reviewer panel executes multiple independent subagents to evaluate the same question without shared context. This separation prevents cross-contamination of reasoning, ensuring each reviewer's verdict remains an independent assessment.

You generate an audit trail by executing parallel reviewers and aggregating their results. This process emits per-reviewer outputs alongside a consolidated panel report, providing complete traceability for the final consensus verdict.

Use a majority vote verification approach when deterministic checks are insufficient for robust validation. It is ideal for complex questions requiring consensus, where isolated parallel review by multiple subagents provides higher reliability.

No, the panel review operates on exactly one run root and one panel key at a time. It spawns three identical reviewer runs for that single question to produce independent outputs and a consolidated verdict.

If reviewers disagree, the aggregation consolidates outputs by majority rules. As long as two out of three reviewers agree, the system emits a definitive PASS or BLOCK verdict for the panel report.