What problem does it solve? Authors lack an objective, reviewer-style assessment of a manuscript before submission, so structural flaws, overclaims, and mechanical issues surface only after peer review or desk rejection. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Five audit modes: quick-audit for readiness screens, deep-review for a full reviewer-style issue bundle, gate for PASS/FAIL submission decisions, re-audit for comparing revisions against prior reports, and polish prechecks. - Deterministic PRESUBMISSION layer: script-backed checks for em dashes, AI-tone term frequency, abstract completeness, and LaTeX citation/label/equation hygiene, kept separate from LLM reviewer judgment. - Committee and lane reviewers: editor, theory, literature, methodology, and logic committee agents plus cross-cutting lanes produce quote-anchored findings consolidated into a structured issue schema with a revision roadmap. - Use Case: Before submitting to IEEE, run gate mode on paper.tex to get an EIC desk-reject screening, a blocker list, and advisory items, then run deep-review to receive review_report.md and revision_suggestions.md with concrete fixes. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to run a deep review of your manuscript, for example: review paper.tex like a serious conference reviewer and list the biggest validity risks.
