paper-audit

Audit scholarly manuscripts in LaTeX, Typst, or PDF with structured review workflows.

Updated Aug 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/yufangjie1643/owner_CMAME --skill paper-audit-yufangjie1643
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: paper-audit
Source: https://github.com/yufangjie1643/owner_CMAME/tree/main/.agents/skills/paper-audit
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/yufangjie1643/owner_CMAME --skill paper-audit-yufangjie1643

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

The skill provides a structured, reviewer-like audit workflow to identify major and minor issues in scholarly manuscripts and generate actionable revision roadmaps.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Delivers script-backed issue bundles, SRQR-aligned checks, and a revision roadmap.
  • Supports multiple audit modes (quick-audit, deep-review, gate, re-audit, polish) and outputs artifacts like review_report.md, peer_review_report.md, final_issues.json, and revision_roadmap.md.
  • Enables committee-style evaluation with dedicated reviewer agents and standard templates for structured feedback.

Quick Start

Prepare a review workspace and run the audit with the desired mode to generate the primary artifacts.

Frequently Asked Questions about paper-audit

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate peer review for a LaTeX or PDF manuscript?

Automate peer review for LaTeX or PDF manuscripts by running a deep-review-first audit workflow that uses reviewer agents and section-indexing to generate structured issue bundles and revision roadmaps.

Can I run a deep-review audit on a Typst document?

Yes, you can run a deep-review audit on a Typst document. The skill applies a reviewer-like audit workflow across Typst, LaTeX, and PDF files to identify manuscript issues and produce structured feedback.

What is a deep-review-first framework for scholarly manuscripts?

A deep-review-first framework for scholarly manuscripts is an evidence-based critique process that applies reviewer agents to evaluate texts, assembling final issue bundles and actionable revision roadmaps.

How do I generate a revision roadmap from a PDF paper?

Generate a revision roadmap from a PDF paper by executing the deep-review or gate audit mode, which evaluates the manuscript and outputs structured artifacts like revision_roadmap.md and final_issues.json.

Does this manuscript audit tool support quick checks before a full review?

Yes, the manuscript audit tool supports quick checks through its quick-audit mode, allowing you to perform rapid initial evaluations before committing to a full deep-review workflow.

What is the best way to structure peer review feedback for academic papers?

The best way to structure peer review feedback for academic papers is using SRQR-aligned checks and standard templates, which assemble committee-style evaluations into structured artifacts like peer_review_report.md.