paper-context-resolver

To resolve reproduction gaps, you can consult the primary paper to confirm exact dataset splits and preprocessing details when the README is ambiguous. This requires linking the target paper and specifying the exact detail to generate an evidence-backed conflict note.

The best way to confirm evaluation protocols is to use a targeted resolver that checks official paper sources against README guidance. It records any conflicts between the two, ensuring reproduction support without replacing the original README instructions.

Yes, you need a linked paper and access to official sources to resolve runtime assumptions and checkpoint mappings. The Skill narrows evidence from these sources to fill specific reproduction-critical gaps left open by the README.

Conflict resolution works by comparing ambiguous README guidance against official paper sources, then generating a conflict note. This note records discrepancies in dataset versions or evaluation protocols while strictly preserving the README-first workflow policy.

You should not use it when the README provides clear, broad instructions or when you lack access to the official primary paper. It is designed only for narrow, reproduction-critical gaps where the README is explicitly ambiguous about specific details.