Simulate rigorous peer review to identify weaknesses in research proposals.
npx skills add https://github.com/BraveDistribution/claude-skills --skill paper-critic
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: paper-critic Source: https://github.com/BraveDistribution/claude-skills/tree/main/paper-critic Command: npx skills add https://github.com/BraveDistribution/claude-skills --skill paper-critic
This skill helps researchers critically evaluate research proposals by simulating a rigorous peer review process, identifying weaknesses, and stress-testing claims before publication.
Provide a rigorous, point-by-point critique of the user's research proposal as a top-tier reviewer.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
To get peer review feedback on a research proposal, you need a tool that simulates a rigorous reviewer process to identify weaknesses and stress-test claims. This skill provides adversarial critique covering novelty, methodology, and experimental design to improve publishability.
A novelty check evaluates your draft paper against existing literature to identify true contributions. This skill performs simulated scientific peer review to assess novelty, methodology, and writing, providing actionable, reviewer-style feedback for revisions.
Yes, you can simulate a reviewer for CVPR, NeurIPS, or MICCAI venues. The skill provides venue-targeted feedback by applying current venue guidelines to your research proposal, identifying kill-shots and structured evaluation criteria specific to top-tier conferences.
Yes, this peer review critique works for medical imaging and computer science research directions. It applies structured prompts to your detailed proposal input to generate methodology critique and experimental design assessment tailored to your specific domain.
The best way to critique experimental design is through adversarial review that identifies methodological weaknesses and kill-shots. This skill evaluates your experimental setup, checks claims, and provides structured, actionable feedback to guide revisions before publication.
When using simulated peer review for a draft paper, limitations include the requirement for a detailed proposal input and current venue guidelines access. It simulates reviewer feedback but cannot replace actual human expert validation for final publication decisions.
carson-sweetManage academic paper development through a six-phase quality-gated pipeline.
sjtuytcCoordinate structured external reviewer feedback for research projects and papers.
OlixIgnaciousAutomate academic paper research, venue validation, and formatting guidance.
runchr-comIdentify and suggest fixes for grammar, logical, and flow errors in text.
