paper-review

Automate multi-round undergraduate thesis reviews with DOCX annotations and revision tasks.

1|Updated Mar 16, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/alonegg/skills --skill paper-review-alonegg
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: paper-review
Source: https://github.com/alonegg/skills/tree/main/paper-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/alonegg/skills --skill paper-review-alonegg

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires defusedxml, and includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Paper Review & Annotation enables educators to perform systematic, multi-round critiques of undergraduate theses, turning vague feedback into concrete, actionable tasks.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Five-phase multi-round review workflow: full thesis understanding, structural evaluation, paragraph-level critique, issue aggregation, and revision iteration.
  • Structured diagnostics and actionable revision tasks: outputs a repair task list with priority levels and next-step guidance.
  • DOCX integration and annotation: produces annotated Word documents with tracked comments and a separate audit/summary output.
  • Stateful review management: maintains a review_state.json to support resume, cross-round tracking, and auditability.

Quick Start

Upload an undergraduate thesis to start a five-phase review that yields a structured diagnostic report and a prioritized revision task list.

Frequently Asked Questions about paper-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate multi-round thesis review with structured revision tasks?

Automating multi-round thesis review involves a five-phase workflow that evaluates document structure, critiques paragraphs, and aggregates issues into a prioritized revision task list. This produces an annotated DOCX file and a persistent review state for tracking.

Can I add tracked annotations directly to a DOCX file during thesis review?

Yes, tracked annotations can be added directly to a DOCX file during thesis review. The workflow integrates with DOCX processing to embed Word comments into the document while generating a separate audit-ready summary output.

What is a multi-phase review workflow for undergraduate theses?

A multi-phase review workflow for undergraduate theses systematically evaluates work through five stages: full understanding, structural evaluation, paragraph-level critique, issue aggregation, and revision iteration. This ensures feedback evolves from broad assessment to specific, actionable modifications.

Does this thesis review workflow support resuming across multiple revision rounds?

Yes, this thesis review workflow supports resuming across multiple revision rounds. It maintains a persistent review_state.json file that captures diagnostics and modification guidance, enabling cross-round tracking, auditability, and seamless continuation.

How do I turn vague academic feedback into actionable revision tasks?

To turn vague academic feedback into actionable revision tasks, aggregate paragraph-level critiques into a structured diagnostic report. The workflow assigns priority levels and next-step guidance, converting broad comments into a specific repair task list.