paper-review-conclusion

Audit research conclusions for alignment with questions and actionable recommendations.

1|Updated Mar 16, 2026

Search Tags:#audit #recommendations #research-review #academic-writing #findings #conclusion #evidence-boundary

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/alonegg/skills --skill paper-review-conclusion

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: paper-review-conclusion
Source: https://github.com/alonegg/skills/tree/main/paper-review/sub-skills/conclusion
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/alonegg/skills --skill paper-review-conclusion

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

结论与建议专项审阅规则用于对论文的结论/建议段落进行系统审查，确保结论回应研究问题、提炼关键发现、界定边界、提出可操作性建议、明确发现与建议的对应关系、体现局限意识、实现全文收束。

Core Features & Use Cases

针对结论段落进行回扣检查，确保与前文研究问题、证据链及发现相一致。
提供将发现提炼成分层结论的模板，并映射到具体可执行的建议。
适用于作者、同行评审、编辑等角色，帮助形成清晰、可追溯的收束段落。

Quick Start

Provide the conclusion section to the system and invoke the conclusion review workflow to verify alignment with the research questions and generate actionable recommendations.

Frequently Asked Questions about paper-review-conclusion

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I ensure research conclusions directly address the original questions and synthesize findings?▼

To ensure research conclusions address original questions and synthesize findings, audit the conclusion paragraph to verify it links directly back to the evidence chain and bounds its scope based on actual discoveries. This enforces a structured approach mapping findings to clear, traceable answers.

What is the best way to translate academic findings into concrete, actionable recommendations?▼

The best way to translate academic findings into concrete recommendations is to apply a structured audit that maps each finding to a specific, measurable action. This process enforces defining scope limits and proposing actionable steps that remain strictly bounded by the available evidence.

Can I use this conclusion audit workflow for policy reports and literature reviews?▼

Yes, you can use this conclusion audit workflow for policy reports and literature reviews. The structured approach applies to any manuscript where conclusions must be bounded, linked to evidence, and translated into concrete actions to ensure clear, traceable alignment.

How do I check if my manuscript's conclusion section has a clear evidence boundary?▼

To check if your manuscript's conclusion section has a clear evidence boundary, audit the text to verify it explicitly defines scope limits and acknowledges limitations. This ensures the conclusions remain strictly linked to the available evidence without overgeneralizing findings.

Why does my paper conclusion fail to propose measurable recommendations?▼

Your paper conclusion fails to propose measurable recommendations because it lacks a structured mapping from findings to specific actions. Auditing the conclusion enforces this by defining scope limits and translating synthesized discoveries into concrete, actionable, and measurable steps.

When do I need to audit a research conclusion section for alignment?▼

You need to audit a research conclusion section for alignment when finalizing manuscripts, reviews, or policy reports. This process verifies that the conclusions respond to original research questions, synthesize key findings, and propose actionable recommendations bounded by evidence.