skills.rest
leonardofhy
leonardofhyCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

paper-review

Generate structured critical reviews for conference and journal submissions.

Updated Aug 27, 2026
Search Tags:#scoring#critique#structured-feedback#peer-review#academic-writing#paper-review
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/leonardofhy/openclaw-workspace --skill paper-review-leonardofhy
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: paper-review
Source: https://github.com/leonardofhy/openclaw-workspace/tree/main/skills/paper-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/leonardofhy/openclaw-workspace --skill paper-review-leonardofhy

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill provides a structured, four-step workflow to critique academic papers, predict scores, distill key points, and draft formal English reviews, enhancing fairness and efficiency in peer review.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Systematic four-step process: Step 1: critical reading; Step 2: score prediction; Step 3: point refinement; Step 4: formal English review.
  • Bilingual workflow: deep analysis in traditional Chinese, followed by an English-ready final output.
  • Use Case: reviewers at conferences or journals can generate structured feedback and reproducible evaluations to support decision making.

Quick Start

Input a manuscript and run Step 1 to begin the critical review.

Frequently Asked Questions about paper-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I generate a structured peer review for a scholarly manuscript?▼

A structured peer review requires a systematic workflow: critical reading, score prediction, point refinement, and drafting a formal English review. This four-step process generates reproducible feedback suitable for conference and journal rebuttals.

What is the best way to predict a score for an academic paper submission?▼

Predicting a score for an academic paper submission is best done by applying a predefined rubric during critical reading. The workflow uses supporting references to evaluate the manuscript and systematically predict a score based on structured criteria.

How does the academic paper review process handle bilingual feedback?▼

The academic paper review process handles bilingual feedback by conducting deep critical analysis in traditional Chinese, followed by generating an English-ready formal review output. This ensures rigorous evaluation before producing the final English feedback.

Can I use this workflow to review conference and journal submissions?▼

Yes, you can use this workflow to review conference and journal submissions. It is specifically designed to assist reviewers in evaluating scholarly papers by generating structured, critical, and reproducible feedback for these types of academic publications.

Do I need supporting references to critique a scholarly paper?▼

Yes, you need supporting references to critique a scholarly paper effectively. The review process relies on a rubric and these references to generate structured feedback, ensuring the evaluation is rigorous, fair, and reproducible for rebuttals.

Related Skills

Explore More Education & Research Skills→
WILLOSCARWILLOSCAR
497

manuscript-ingest

Convert manuscript text or PDFs into plain text with preserved headings.

Community
Basic
JunMA98JunMA98
3

peer-review

Evaluate CS paper submissions for novelty, correctness, and reproducibility.

Community
Advanced
joshuarolljoshuaroll

academic-research

Search scholarly papers via Semantic Scholar and ArXiv with citation filtering and BibTeX export.

Community
Intermediate
sencersoylusencersoylu

internal-peer-review

Generate severity-scored feedback across manuscript sections within Scholar Flow.

Community
Advanced