skills.rest
JeanDiable
JeanDiableCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
WebsiteGitHub

paper-reviewing

Analyze academic paper PDFs to generate conference-style peer reviews.

18|2|Updated Mar 3, 2026
Search Tags:#pdf#reproducibility#peer-review#research-evaluation#conference-format#academic-analysis#paper-reviewing
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/JeanDiable/academic-research-plugin --skill paper-reviewing
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: paper-reviewing
Source: https://github.com/JeanDiable/academic-research-plugin/tree/main/skills/paper-reviewing
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/JeanDiable/academic-research-plugin --skill paper-reviewing

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires pybtex, and includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Conducts a thorough, conference-style peer review of an academic paper, outlining strengths, weaknesses, and evaluative criteria to guide submission decisions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Six-dimension evaluation: Automatically assesses novelty, technical soundness, clarity, significance, reproducibility, and experimental design.
  • Conference-format outputs: Produces structured reviews in NeurIPS, ICML, CVPR, ACL, AAAI, ICCV, ICLR formats or a generic template, including questions and a detailed scoring rubric.
  • Missing references & reproducibility guidance: Identifies potential gaps relative to related work and documents reproducibility considerations for reviewers.

Quick Start

Submit a PDF manuscript to generate a conference-style peer review.

Frequently Asked Questions about paper-reviewing

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I generate a conference-style peer review for an academic paper?▼

To generate a conference-style peer review, submit an academic paper PDF to receive a structured evaluation across six dimensions, including strengths, weaknesses, questions, and detailed scoring rubrics.

What academic conference formats are supported for structured paper reviews?▼

Supported conference formats for structured paper reviews include NeurIPS, ICML, CVPR, ACL, AAAI, ICCV, ICLR, and a generic template, ensuring outputs match specific venue submission requirements.

Can I assess research reproducibility and experimental design from a PDF manuscript?▼

Yes, you can assess research reproducibility and experimental design from a PDF manuscript, as the review process evaluates these specific dimensions and documents reproducibility considerations for reviewers.

How does the peer-review process identify missing references in related work?▼

The peer-review process identifies missing references by scanning the academic paper to detect potential gaps relative to related work, helping reviewers pinpoint overlooked foundational literature.

What evaluation dimensions are used to evaluate academic papers for conference submissions?▼

Academic papers for conference submissions are evaluated across six dimensions: novelty, technical soundness, clarity, significance, reproducibility, and experimental design.

Do I need to specify a venue or severity parameter when reviewing an academic paper?▼

You need to provide a PDF input as required, while venue and severity parameters are optional for customizing the conference format and review strictness during the academic analysis.

Related Skills

Explore More Education & Research Skills→
zm2231zm2231

peer-review

Generate structured peer reviews for academic manuscripts with recommendations.

Community
Intermediate
xdrshjrxdrshjr
1

paper-review

Analyze academic papers and generate structured peer reviews with standardized scoring.

Community
Advanced
goupup-aigoupup-ai
2

citation-audit

Verify bibliographic citations in academic LaTeX papers against canonical sources.

Community
Advanced
LuisSambranoLuisSambrano
7

llm-eval

Evaluate LLM applications using automated metrics and human feedback.

Community
Advanced