What problem does it solve? Researchers often struggle to see whether their paper has a clear central thread, whether claims are backed by evidence, and where the logic breaks between sections. This Skill analyzes a draft or raw materials to surface the paper's main line of argument, classify claims by evidence support, and locate structural gaps. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Red-line identification: Compresses the paper's core question, motivation, method, and contribution into one anchoring sentence that all structural decisions are measured against. - Claim triage: Sorts every major claim into evidence-supported, inferential, or needs-more-data buckets, with discipline-specific criteria for STEM, humanities, social science, and legal writing. - Seven-anchor coherence check: Extracts seven key sentences (motivation, problem, gap, contribution, method rationale, core result, discussion answer) to verify the paper tells one continuous story. - Use Case: A PhD student pastes a messy draft and asks where the logic breaks; the Skill returns a located diagnosis of broken transitions, a promise-response table between introduction and results, and a reordered outline with the function of each section explained. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to analyze the structure and argument flow of your attached paper draft and point out where the logic breaks.
