paperjury

Stress-test research papers for unsupported claims and weak experiments.

923|42|Updated Jun 2, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/u7079256/paperjury --skill paperjury
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: paperjury
Source: https://github.com/u7079256/paperjury/tree/main
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/u7079256/paperjury --skill paperjury

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

PaperJury helps researchers identify unsupported claims, weak experiments, unclear writing, and submission risks before peer review, while preventing unsafe or evidence-free revisions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Adversarial paper review: Simulates multiple domain reviewers, routes disputed issues through a two-sided trial, and produces invalid, fixable, or author-required verdicts.
  • Bounded revision workflow: Drafts minimal LaTeX or Markdown edits, requires author sign-off, tracks issues in a durable ledger, and applies risk-proportional safety checks.
  • Format and submission checks: Supports LaTeX, Markdown, plain text, and one-time Word extraction, with compile validation, structural linting, compliance screening, and explicit degradation when tools are unavailable.
  • Use Case: Before submitting a machine learning paper, ask PaperJury to review the experiments and claims, then use its evidence-backed ledger and verified patches to address safe issues while retaining research decisions for the author.

Quick Start

Ask PaperJury to review your paper, especially whether its experiments and claims are adequately supported.

Frequently Asked Questions about paperjury

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I stress-test a research paper before submission?

Yes, adversarial peer review supports LaTeX, Markdown, plain-text, and one-time Word extraction. It performs structural linting and compile validation to check formatting compliance, explicitly degrading safely when optional toolchains are unavailable.

Does this paper review workflow require Node.js and LaTeX toolchains?

This paper review workflow requires Node.js for deterministic guards, while an optional LaTeX toolchain enables real compilation and layout checks. Manuscripts can still be processed in Markdown or plain text without the LaTeX environment.

How do I apply safe manuscript edits without changing core research decisions?

To apply safe manuscript edits without changing research decisions, use bounded revision workflows that draft minimal LaTeX or Markdown patches. The system requires author sign-off and applies risk-proportional safety checks before validating any modifications.

When should I use adversarial review for a computer science manuscript?

Use adversarial review for a computer science manuscript before conference submission to route disputed issues through a two-sided trial. It produces invalid, fixable, or author-required verdicts to prevent unsafe or evidence-free revisions during multi-round workflows.

What are the limitations of automated paper review without a LaTeX toolchain?

Without a LaTeX toolchain, automated paper review limitations include the inability to perform real compilation and layout checks. The system explicitly degrades its formatting and submission compliance screening capabilities when these optional tools are missing.