parallel-evaluation

Coordinate multi-agent parallel scans and consolidate findings into an action list.

Updated Mar 3, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/tarrragon/ccsession --skill parallel-evaluation
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: parallel-evaluation
Source: https://github.com/tarrragon/ccsession/tree/main/.claude/skills/parallel-evaluation
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/tarrragon/ccsession --skill parallel-evaluation

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Coordinate multi-agent parallel scanning to surface actionable improvements by consolidating findings from diverse perspectives.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Phase 1: collect targets and define scope.
  • Phase 2: perform parallel scans using 2-4 agents from different perspectives.
  • Phase 3: apply a Worth-It Filter to retain only actionable items and generate an action list.
  • Use cases include code reviews, refactor decisions, architecture evaluations, and incident reporting.

Quick Start

Provide a target and select multiple perspectives to start the parallel evaluation and generate an action-ready report.

Frequently Asked Questions about parallel-evaluation

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I run a multi-agent parallel evaluation for code reviews?

A multi-agent parallel evaluation operates in three phases: collect targets and define scope, perform parallel scans using 2-4 agents from different perspectives, and apply a Worth-It filter to retain only actionable items. This generates an action-ready report for code reviews or architecture assessments.

How does the Worth-It filter work in parallel architecture evaluations?

The Worth-It filter in parallel architecture evaluations retains only actionable items by consolidating findings from diverse perspectives. It operates in Phase 3 to filter out noise, ensuring your action list contains only high-value improvements.

Can I configure specific lenses or perspectives for multi-agent code reviews?

Yes, you can configure lenses for multi-agent code reviews. The parallel evaluation supports lens configurations, allowing 2-4 agents to scan targets from diverse, customized perspectives during Phase 2 to surface specific architectural or quality improvements.

What is the best way to assess refactor decisions across multiple perspectives?

The best way to assess refactor decisions is using parallel scanning to consolidate findings from 2-4 agents. By applying a Worth-It filter after collecting diverse perspectives, you retain only actionable improvements for confident decision-making.

Does parallel evaluation support linux agents for incident reporting?

Yes, parallel evaluation supports linux agents for incident reporting. You can configure linux agents during Phase 2 to perform parallel scans, consolidating multi-perspective findings to surface actionable improvements for incident reviews.