What problem does it solve? Single-perspective code reviews miss architectural flaws or implementation bugs, and stale plan documents lead reviewers to critique code that no longer exists. This Skill coordinates multiple expert reviewers and integrates their findings into one verified report. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Parallel expert dispatch: Sends an architect subagent (structure, composition, naming) and a domain engineer subagent (idioms, correctness, edge cases) to review the same change concurrently, then merges findings by theme. - Adversarial conflict resolution: When experts disagree, each defends its position and the orchestrator settles disputes by reading the actual merged source rather than trusting lane counts. - MoE plan review variant: Ground-truths every claim in a refactor plan against current code before dispatch, routes open questions through an owner-gate decision form, and produces before/after mermaid architecture diagrams. - Use Case: Before starting a large refactor, dispatch all expert personas against the plan document, collect a unified findings report with severity ratings, answer owner questions via decision cards, and receive before/after module diagrams — all before writing any code. ## Quick Start Review this pull request with parallel architect and engineer experts, integrate their findings, and flag any conflicts for adversarial resolution.
