What problem does it solve?
It helps you assess whether an invention is likely patentable by testing novelty (anticipation) and non-obviousness (inventive step) against prior art, including drafting claim-element based analyses.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Claim Element Extraction: Breaks the invention into key claim elements and drafts preliminary independent claims (method + system) to set a consistent comparison target.
- Prior-Art Novelty Testing (Anticipation): Checks whether any single prior-art reference discloses all claim elements, producing a claim-by-reference verdict matrix.
- Obviousness Testing (Inventive Step): Evaluates likely obvious combinations of 2–3 references by identifying primary/secondary references, missing elements, and motivation to combine.
- Jurisdiction-Specific Output: Produces structured assessments for US (35 USC 102/103), CN (Article 22), and EP (Article 54/56) based on the same underlying analysis logic.
- Cross-Model Examiner Verification: Uses a designated reviewer model via Codex MCP to stress-test anticipation/obviousness conclusions and recommend amendments.
Quick Start
Ask the skill to assess patent novelty for your invention by providing a clear invention description (and ensure you also have a prior art report at patent/PRIOR_ART_REPORT.md).