What problem does it solve? Drafting patent claims and specifications without critical feedback risks rejections on clarity, novelty, enablement, or obviousness grounds that are expensive to fix after filing. This Skill simulates a formal patent examiner review so weaknesses are caught and corrected before submission. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Multi-Round Examiner Review: Sends claims, specification, and prior art to GPT-5.5 via Codex MCP with xhigh reasoning, acting as a USPTO/CNIPA/EPO examiner issuing a formal office action. - Statutory Grounds Analysis: Evaluates claims against clarity (112(b)/Art 84), written description, enablement, novelty (102/Art 54), and non-obviousness (103/Art 56) standards. - Iterative Fix-and-Recheck Workflow: Implements amendments for CRITICAL and MAJOR issues, then runs a follow-up review round using the same thread to verify rejections are overcome. - Use Case: After drafting claims and specification for an invention, run this Skill to receive a scored office action, apply suggested claim amendments, and produce a PATENT_REVIEW.md report confirming readiness for jurisdiction formatting. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to run a patent examiner review on the patent directory containing your drafted claims and specification.
