patent-reviewer

Automate patent application reviews for USPTO MPEP compliance.

167|28|Updated Nov 15, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/RobThePCGuy/Claude-Patent-Creator --skill patent-reviewer
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: patent-reviewer
Source: https://github.com/RobThePCGuy/Claude-Patent-Creator/tree/main/skills/patent-reviewer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/RobThePCGuy/Claude-Patent-Creator --skill patent-reviewer

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Manually reviewing patent applications against the extensive USPTO MPEP guidelines is a complex, time-consuming, and error-prone process. This Skill automates the review, ensuring compliance with 35 USC 112 and MPEP 608, significantly reducing the risk of office actions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Comprehensive Parallel Review: Simultaneously checks claims, specification, and formalities for compliance.
  • 35 USC 112 Compliance: Analyzes claims for definiteness and antecedent basis, and specification for written description, enablement, and best mode.
  • MPEP 608 Formalities Check: Verifies abstract length, title format, drawing references, and required sections.
  • Use Case: A patent attorney has a draft application and needs a thorough compliance check before filing. This skill runs a full review, identifies all issues by severity, and provides a prioritized list of fixes with MPEP citations.

Quick Start

Perform a full review of my patent application draft, checking claims, specification, and formalities.

Frequently Asked Questions about patent-reviewer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I check a patent application for USPTO compliance before filing?

Patent application compliance review automates checks against MPEP guidelines for claims, specification, and formalities. This Skill simultaneously analyzes your draft against 35 USC 112 and MPEP 608 standards, identifying issues by severity with MPEP citations and remediation steps to reduce office action risk.

What does a claims analysis for USPTO compliance include?

Claims analysis examines definiteness and antecedent basis to ensure each claim term is clearly defined and properly introduced. The Skill flags violations of 35 USC 112(b) requirements and cross-references specific MPEP sections so you can revise before submission.

Can I verify specification for written description, enablement, and best mode requirements?

Yes. Specification review checks for written description sufficiency, enablement breadth, and best mode disclosure under 35 USC 112(a). The Skill identifies gaps in technical detail and provides guidance tied to MPEP standards to strengthen your application.

How do formalities checks work for patent applications?

MPEP 608 formalities verification checks abstract length, title formatting, drawing reference consistency, and required sections. The Skill catches structural and presentation issues early so corrections don't delay filing or trigger administrative rejections.

What output does a full patent application review provide?

The Skill outputs a prioritized list of identified compliance issues organized by severity, each with MPEP citations and actionable remediation guidance. Results cover claims, specification, and formalities in a single parallel review pass.

Do I need legal expertise to interpret the compliance findings?

The Skill is designed for patent attorneys and drafting professionals. It surfaces issues with severity levels and MPEP references; legal judgment is still required to evaluate remediation trade-offs and filing strategy.