paw-plan-review

To review an implementation plan for spec alignment, evaluate the plan document against project requirements to ensure feasibility and completeness. This surfaces gaps and risks, returning structured PASS or FAIL feedback with actionable issues before development proceeds.

Structured PASS/FAIL feedback for implementation plan evaluation is a review mechanism assessing plan completeness and spec alignment. It returns actionable issues and risks to the orchestrator, preserving control while surfacing necessary improvements across project phases.

Yes, you can evaluate an ImplementationPlan.md during a subagent planning session. The review applies directly within these sessions to assess spec requirement coverage and quality criteria, providing structured feedback to the orchestrator.

Yes, plan review works without external dependencies for risk identification. The process independently identifies risks, gaps, and actionable improvements across project phases by evaluating the implementation plan against quality criteria and spec requirements.

The best way to identify gaps in an implementation plan across project phases is to conduct a structured review evaluating spec requirement coverage and quality criteria. This surfaces actionable issues and risks, returning PASS or FAIL feedback to maintain orchestrator control.

You need a plan review for feasibility and completeness before implementation proceeds. This evaluates the ImplementationPlan.md during subagent planning sessions to ensure spec alignment, identifying risks and gaps that could impact project execution.