pear-rfp-solver

Draft compliant RFP, RFI, and security questionnaire responses from precedent sources.

Updated May 15, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Pear-Commerce/pear-ai-skills --skill pear-rfp-solver
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: pear-rfp-solver
Source: https://github.com/Pear-Commerce/pear-ai-skills/tree/main/skills/pear-rfp-solver
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Pear-Commerce/pear-ai-skills --skill pear-rfp-solver

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) and assets (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill eliminates the time-consuming, error-prone work of manually drafting responses to Pear Commerce RFP, RFI, security questionnaire, legal diligence, privacy, and technical buyer questions, ensuring answers are consistent with approved precedent, compliant with legal and security requirements, and formatted correctly for customer-facing use.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Precedent-Sourced Answers: Pulls from bundled approved RFP/RFI/security/legal sources (including AB InBev, Kimberly-Clark, McCormick, and SIG questionnaire responses) to maintain consistency with past approved content.
  • Compliance Guardrails: Includes built-in checks to avoid unapproved legal, security, or privacy commitments, flags claims that need current verification or legal review, and strips internal context from customer-facing output.
  • Multi-Format Support: Handles all common RFP artifact types including questionnaire tables, free-form questions, SIG-style security forms, DPA/subprocessor answers, product capability matrices, and sales/enterprise RFP copy.
  • Use Case: A sales ops user needs to respond to a prospect's security questionnaire asking about subprocessors, encryption standards, and patch management policies; the skill pulls the correct approved answers from bundled sources, flags any items that need current verification, and formats the response to match the prospect's required table structure.

Quick Start

Use the pear-rfp-solver skill to draft a compliant, sourced response to the attached customer security questionnaire's subprocessor and encryption questions, citing bundled sources and flagging any claims that need current verification.

Frequently Asked Questions about pear-rfp-solver

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I draft compliant responses for a security questionnaire and RFP?

To draft compliant responses for a security questionnaire or RFP, source answers from approved precedents, apply legal guardrails to prevent unverified claims, and strip internal context before formatting output for the customer.

What is the best way to answer RFI and DPA subprocessor questions accurately?

Answering RFI and DPA subprocessor questions accurately requires leveraging bundled approved sources like past SIG responses, ensuring consistency with legal and security requirements, and formatting output to match the prospect's required table structure.

Can I use bundled precedent sources to handle SIG-style security forms?

Yes, you can use bundled precedent sources from past approved SIG-style security forms to maintain consistency, automatically populate questionnaire tables, and flag items requiring current verification or legal review.

How do compliance guardrails prevent unapproved legal commitments in RFP responses?

Compliance guardrails prevent unapproved legal commitments by flagging claims needing current verification, stripping internal context from customer-facing output, and ensuring responses rely strictly on sourced precedent answers.

Does this approach support product capability matrices and enterprise RFP copy?

Yes, this approach supports all common RFP artifact types including product capability matrices, enterprise RFP copy, free-form questions, and DPA answers by leveraging bundled precedent sources and live lookups for current content.

What are the limitations when using precedent sources for vendor assessment responses?

A key limitation is that precedent-sourced answers may require current verification; the system flags unverified claims and items needing legal review, meaning you cannot rely solely on past precedents without validating current accuracy.