pedagogy-review

Review lecture slide decks for narrative, prerequisites, examples, notation, and pacing.

1|1|Updated Apr 30, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/xashgg/claude-code-my-workflow-codex --skill pedagogy-review-xashgg
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: pedagogy-review
Source: https://github.com/xashgg/claude-code-my-workflow-codex/tree/main/.codex/skills/pedagogy-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/xashgg/claude-code-my-workflow-codex --skill pedagogy-review-xashgg

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires python, and includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a detailed pedagogical review of lecture slides, addressing narrative arc, prerequisite assumptions, worked examples, notation clarity, and pacing.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Narrative Arc: Ensures a strong flow and logical progression in the lecture material.
  • Assumptions and Prerequisites: Checks for clarity and completeness of assumed knowledge.
  • Worked Examples: Evaluates the quality and effectiveness of example problems.
  • Notation Clarity: Inspects the clarity of mathematical and technical notation.
  • Pacing: Assesses the appropriate pace for the material and the target audience.

Quick Start

Run the 'pedagogy-review' skill with the filename of the slide deck you wish to review.

Frequently Asked Questions about pedagogy-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review lecture slides for pedagogical effectiveness and narrative flow?

A pedagogical review analyzes lecture slide decks to evaluate narrative arc, prerequisite clarity, worked example effectiveness, notation quality, and pacing, producing a comprehensive review report.

How do I check if my lecture slides have clear mathematical notation and prerequisites?

A pedagogical review inspects lecture slides to evaluate mathematical and technical notation clarity while verifying that prerequisite assumptions and assumed knowledge are explicitly stated for the target audience.

What is the best way to evaluate worked examples and pacing in a lecture slide deck?

A pedagogical review evaluates lecture slide decks by assessing the quality and effectiveness of worked example problems and determining if the overall pacing suits the target audience and material complexity.

Do I need Python to run a pedagogical review on my lecture slides?

Yes, Python is required to run the pedagogical review because the analysis and reporting scripts depend on Python to process the lecture slide deck and generate the evaluation report.

Can I analyze lecture slide pacing and narrative consistency automatically?

Yes, a pedagogical review automatically analyzes lecture slide decks to ensure a strong narrative arc and logical progression while assessing whether the pacing is appropriate for the material and target audience.

What are the limitations of using automated scripts for lecture slide pedagogy review?

Automated pedagogical review scripts evaluate lecture slides based on predefined criteria like narrative consistency and notation clarity, but may miss subjective teaching nuances or unconventional lecture styles outside their programmed analysis parameters.