Verified:GitHub

peer-review

Guide manuscript section evaluation with markdown checklists and schematic tools.

1|Updated Mar 20, 2026

Search Tags:#visualization #diagram generation #scientific evaluation #peer review #manuscript critique #review checklist

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/jadzoghaib/Sabadell_Capstone --skill peer-review-jadzoghaib

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: peer-review
Source: https://github.com/jadzoghaib/Sabadell_Capstone/tree/main/.claude/skills/peer-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/jadzoghaib/Sabadell_Capstone --skill peer-review-jadzoghaib

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires requests, and includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill streamlines the peer review process by providing structured evaluation guidelines and visual tools, saving time and improving review quality.

Core Features & Use Cases

Structured Manuscript Evaluation: Guides detailed section-by-section peer reviews, including methodology, results, and ethics.
Diagram Integration: Assists in generating publication-quality schematics to visualize complex concepts and workflows.
Use Case: A researcher receives a manuscript draft and uses this Skill to assess scientific rigor, identify gaps, and create illustrative diagrams for revisions.

Quick Start

Review a submitted manuscript for methodological soundness and generate a schematic to clarify the experimental workflow.

Frequently Asked Questions about peer-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I conduct a structured manuscript critique for a peer review?▼

To conduct a structured manuscript critique, this Skill guides you through evaluating methodology, results, and ethics section-by-section using markdown-based checklists to ensure comprehensive scientific peer review.

What should a scientific peer review checklist include?▼

A scientific peer review checklist should include evaluation criteria for methodological soundness, statistical rigor, reproducibility, and ethical compliance to identify gaps and assess scientific rigor in manuscript drafts.

Can I generate experimental workflow schematics during manuscript evaluation?▼

Yes, you can generate experimental workflow schematics during manuscript evaluation, as this Skill provides diagram integration tools to create publication-quality visualizations that clarify complex concepts.

Does this peer review tool require external dependencies to function?▼

This peer review tool requires the Python requests dependency to function, utilizing it alongside internal scripts and reference components to facilitate comprehensive manuscript and grant evaluation.

What is the best way to assess statistical rigor and reproducibility in a manuscript?▼

The best way to assess statistical rigor and reproducibility is by applying structured evaluation guidelines that check methodological soundness section-by-section, ensuring all experimental workflows meet ethical compliance.

Can I use this for grant review as well as manuscript critique?▼

Yes, you can use this for grant review alongside manuscript critique, as it provides structured evaluation guidelines and visual tools designed to assess scientific rigor across both document types.