peer-review

Name: peer-review
Availability: InStock
Author: KOHLEX

Automate auditable alignment reviews of artifacts against the Foundation.

Updated Jun 4, 2026

Search Tags:#automation #alignment #escalation #foundation #gate #peer-review #auditable

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/Kohlex/autopilot-plugin --skill peer-review-kohlex

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: peer-review
Source: https://github.com/Kohlex/autopilot-plugin/tree/main/skills/peer-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Kohlex/autopilot-plugin --skill peer-review-kohlex

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

The peer-review process provides a standardized, auditable gate to ensure artifacts align with the Foundation, preventing drift and ambiguity in complex autonomous workflows.

Core Features & Use Cases

Maps review findings to a 6-category taxonomy and the 4-check rubric, folding into the existing escalation engine to keep governance tight.
Spawns SME personas and a codex cross-model seat per artifact, enabling adversarial, traceable evaluation across gates.
Enforces a cap of 3 review rounds and records verbatim human decisions into an immutable ledger for auditability.

Quick Start

Trigger /peer-review on your artifact to start an auditable alignment review workflow.

Frequently Asked Questions about peer-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I automate auditable alignment reviews against a project Foundation?▼

You can automate auditable alignment reviews by triggering a structured workflow that evaluates artifacts against the Foundation, spawning SME personas and cross-model seats to prevent drift and misinterpretation.

What is an artifact alignment review and when do I need it for autonomous workflows?▼

An artifact alignment review is a standardized governance gate that ensures outputs match your Foundation. You need it in complex autonomous workflows to prevent ambiguity and drift from core specifications.

How do I execute a peer-review workflow on my Foundation artifacts?▼

Trigger the review command on your artifact to start the workflow. The system operates across injection points and task specs, mapping findings to a 6-category taxonomy and 4-check rubric.

Does the alignment review process handle escalation for Foundation defects?▼

Yes, the review process folds into an existing escalation engine. It automatically escalates issues when it detects Foundation defects or when human decisions are required to proceed.

What are the limitations of automated alignment reviews for artifact validation?▼

The process enforces a strict cap of three review rounds to prevent infinite loops. All human decisions are recorded verbatim into an immutable ledger, bounding the maximum automated review depth.