peer-review

Critique academic documents for argument validity and methodological rigor.

8|2|Updated May 10, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Marazii/research-co-pilot --skill peer-review-marazii
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: peer-review
Source: https://github.com/Marazii/research-co-pilot/tree/main/skills/peer-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Marazii/research-co-pilot --skill peer-review-marazii

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides rigorous, constructive peer review and feedback on scholarly work, helping authors improve clarity, validity, and contribution.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured Academic Review: Generates detailed evaluations, including strengths, major issues, and suggestions for improvement.
  • Inline Document Annotation: When provided with Word (.docx) files, attaches comments and tracked changes directly to supporting documents.
  • Versatile Workflows: Supports multiple modes such as paper review, homework grading, committee panel, fact-checking, plagiarism detection, and draft feedback.
  • Customizable Behavior: Users can specify review persona, committee composition, and severity calibration.
  • Multi-format Support: Annotates PDFs, PowerPoint presentations, and LaTeX files, providing an integrated review experience for various scholarly formats.

Quick Start

Invoke with /peer-review, then upload your manuscript or presentation to receive an in-depth critique and inline comments for revisions.

Frequently Asked Questions about peer-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I get expert peer review feedback on my academic research paper?

You can get expert peer review feedback by uploading your manuscript to receive structured evaluations of argument validity, methodological rigor, and literature engagement, along with targeted suggestions for improvement.

Can I add inline comments and tracked changes directly to a Word document for review?

Yes, inline comments and tracked changes can be added directly to Word document files. The review process attaches annotations and suggested revisions straight to the uploaded .docx supporting documents.

Does academic critique and document annotation work with PDF, PowerPoint, and LaTeX files?

Yes, academic critique and document annotation work with PDF, PowerPoint, and LaTeX files to provide an integrated review experience. This multi-format support allows you to assess scholarly content across diverse presentation formats.

What is the best way to simulate a thesis committee panel for research feedback?

The best way to simulate a thesis committee panel for research feedback is by customizing the review persona and committee composition. This allows you to calibrate severity and generate tailored critiques from multiple academic perspectives.

Can I use this scholarly review process for homework grading and plagiarism detection?

Yes, you can use this scholarly review process for homework grading and plagiarism detection. It supports versatile workflows including fact-checking, committee panels, and draft feedback for various academic critique scenarios.

How do I calibrate the severity of methodological rigor assessments during an academic critique?

You calibrate the severity of methodological rigor assessments by specifying the review persona and committee composition. This customizable behavior ensures the academic critique matches your desired scholarly standards.