skills.rest
pur3v4d3r
pur3v4d3rCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

peer-review

Evaluate scientific manuscripts for methodological rigor and reporting quality.

6|Updated Dec 30, 2025
Search Tags:#methodology#ethics#statistics#reproducibility#peer-review#manuscript-evaluation#reporting-guidelines
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/pur3v4d3r/pur3-pkb-codebase --skill peer-review-pur3v4d3r
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: peer-review
Source: https://github.com/pur3v4d3r/pur3-pkb-codebase/tree/main/.claude/skills/__scientific-skills/peer-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/pur3v4d3r/pur3-pkb-codebase --skill peer-review-pur3v4d3r

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Systematic evaluation of scientific manuscripts to identify methodological gaps, statistical missteps, reproducibility issues, and ethical concerns, enabling consistent, high-quality reviews.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Comprehensive, stage-based review workflow covering initial assessment, section-by-section critique (abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion), and reporting quality checks.
  • Structured feedback templates and guidance for major/minor comments, line-by-line notes, and clarifying questions to authors.
  • Reproducibility and transparency emphasis, including data availability, code access, and alignment with reporting standards (CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA, ARRIVE, etc.).

Quick Start

Create a structured peer-review report for a manuscript by following the workflow stages and generating a formal feedback document.

Frequently Asked Questions about peer-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I systematically evaluate a research manuscript for methodological rigor and reporting quality?▼

A manuscript peer-review systematically evaluates methodological rigor, statistical validity, reproducibility, and reporting quality across all manuscript sections including abstract, methods, results, and discussion.

What reporting guidelines are checked during a peer-review for reproducibility?▼

Peer-review checks adherence to reporting guidelines like CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA, and ARRIVE, assessing data availability, code access, and reproducibility transparency.

Can I generate structured peer-review feedback with major and minor comments for a scientific manuscript?▼

Yes, peer-review generates structured feedback templates separating major and minor comments, line-by-line notes, and clarifying questions to authors into a formal evaluation document.

Does peer-review work for evaluating grant proposals across different research disciplines?▼

Yes, peer-review applies its comprehensive assessment framework to evaluate grant proposals and research manuscripts across disciplines, identifying methodological gaps and ethical concerns.

What is the best way to identify statistical missteps and ethical concerns in a manuscript?▼

The best way is a section-by-section critique using a comprehensive assessment framework, targeting methods and results to detect statistical missteps, reproducibility issues, and ethical concerns.

Related Skills

Explore More Education & Research Skills→
silversteinsilverstein
21

peer-review

Evaluate scientific manuscripts for methodological, statistical, ethical, and reporting rigor.

Community
Advanced
XWIlluDeluXWIlluDelu

peer-review

Generate structured peer review feedback with major and minor comments.

Community
Advanced
RConsortiumRConsortium
93

statistical-reviewer

Review clinical trial datasets for statistical accuracy and consistency.

Official
Advanced
JIRBOYJIRBOY
1

paper

Draft, polish, and review academic papers with LaTeX manuscript generation.

Community
Advanced