What problem does it solve? Writing a rigorous, well-structured peer review requires systematically checking methodology, statistics, reproducibility, ethics, and reporting guideline compliance, which is time-consuming and easy to do inconsistently. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Structured Seven-Stage Review Workflow: Guides evaluation from initial assessment through section-by-section analysis, statistical rigor, reproducibility, figure integrity, ethics, and writing quality. - Reporting Standards Compliance: Checks manuscripts against CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA, ARRIVE, MIAME, and other discipline-specific guidelines using bundled reference catalogs. - Common Issues Detection: Identifies frequent problems like p-hacking, pseudoreplication, circular analysis, missing controls, and image manipulation using a curated issue catalog. - Presentation Review: Converts slide deck PDFs to images for mandatory visual inspection of layout, font sizes, contrast, and formatting issues. - Use Case: A journal reviewer receives a clinical trial manuscript and uses this Skill to produce a structured report with a summary statement, numbered major and minor comments, and a CONSORT compliance check. ## Quick Start Review the attached manuscript PDF and produce a structured peer review report with major comments, minor comments, and a recommendation.
