Evaluate papers on experimental design, methodology, writing, and related work.
npx skills add https://github.com/Tnemo65/template --skill peer-review-tnemo65
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: peer-review Source: https://github.com/Tnemo65/template/tree/main/.cursor/skills/13-research-ideation/peer-review Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Tnemo65/template --skill peer-review-tnemo65
This skill simulates rigorous academic peer review to identify weaknesses, anticipate reviewer objections, and improve manuscript quality before submission.
Submit a draft research paper and a few key claims to receive a structured peer-review with actionable feedback.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
Academic peer review is generated by submitting a draft paper and key claims to identify strengths, weaknesses, and novelty. It produces a structured review with scores, rationale, and a formal recommendation to guide revisions.
Anticipating reviewer objections involves applying rigorous standard criteria to evaluate experimental design and methodology. This process highlights potential weaknesses and generates forward-looking questions to strengthen the manuscript against common critiques.
Evaluating novelty requires assessing the paper from a senior reviewer's perspective to identify key contributions. The review rigorously checks related work coverage and applies standard criteria to determine the manuscript's true novelty.
Yes, you can use this peer review process to prepare rebuttals. The review generates a list of questions for authors and provides forward-looking rebuttal preparation templates to help address potential criticisms proactively.
A rigorous academic review should include a clear summary, bullet-style strengths and weaknesses, questions for authors, and scores with rationales. These components provide actionable feedback to systematically improve manuscript quality.
Yes, an automated peer review provides a final recommendation. After evaluating the writing quality, methodology, and experimental design, it outputs a formal recommendation alongside actionable feedback to guide manuscript revisions.
WILLOSCARExtract claims, contributions, and assumptions with source traceability from plain-text manuscripts.
catlog22Parse reviewer comments and generate structured rebuttal and revision plans.
Embers-of-the-FireGenerate theme-organized Related Work sections with citations and formatting.
xashggCheck LaTeX and Quarto files for grammar and typos without altering sources.
