Verified:GitHub

peer-review

Generates structured peer-review reports for manuscripts and grant proposals.

2|Updated Feb 2, 2026

Search Tags:#scientific writing #grant review #peer review #research integrity #manuscript evaluation #reporting standards

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/Weiwei-Mao/hydrology-skills --skill peer-review-weiwei-mao

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: peer-review
Source: https://github.com/Weiwei-Mao/hydrology-skills/tree/main/hydrology-skills/peer-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Weiwei-Mao/hydrology-skills --skill peer-review-weiwei-mao

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a structured, systematic approach to evaluating scientific manuscripts and grant proposals, ensuring thoroughness, rigor, and constructive feedback.

Core Features & Use Cases

Comprehensive Evaluation: Guides users through assessing methodology, statistics, reproducibility, ethics, and writing quality.
Structured Feedback: Helps generate detailed, actionable reports for authors.
Use Case: A journal editor can use this Skill to guide a reviewer in assessing a submitted manuscript, ensuring all critical aspects are covered and providing consistent, high-quality feedback.

Quick Start

Use the peer-review skill to evaluate the attached manuscript draft.

Frequently Asked Questions about peer-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I conduct a structured peer review of a scientific manuscript?▼

Structured peer review of a scientific manuscript requires systematically assessing methodology, statistical validity, reproducibility, and ethical considerations to generate a comprehensive evaluation report with actionable feedback.

What should I look for when evaluating methodology and statistical validity in a research paper?▼

When evaluating methodology and statistical validity, you must identify common methodological issues, ensure adherence to reporting standards, and verify that the research design supports reproducibility and research integrity.

Can I use this structured approach for grant proposal evaluation as well as manuscripts?▼

Yes, this structured evaluation approach supports both scientific manuscript evaluation and grant proposal review, facilitating critical assessment of research plans and generating detailed, constructive feedback reports.

How do I generate a comprehensive review report that provides constructive feedback to authors?▼

To generate a comprehensive review report, you evaluate writing quality, methodology, and ethics, then structure the findings into detailed, actionable feedback that adheres to established scientific reporting standards.

What is the best way to ensure research integrity and reproducibility when reviewing a study?▼

Ensuring research integrity and reproducibility involves critically evaluating the study's methodology and data collection processes, identifying statistical issues, and checking strict adherence to recognized reporting standards.

Does manuscript evaluation require checking for specific reporting standards?▼

Yes, manuscript evaluation requires checking for adherence to established reporting standards to identify common methodological and statistical issues, ensuring the research meets rigorous scientific writing and ethical benchmarks.