skills.rest
Yassire1
Yassire1COMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
WebsiteGitHub

peer-review

Evaluate scientific manuscripts with structured checklists for methodology and ethics.

Updated Aug 23, 2026
Search Tags:#quality control#peer review#manuscript evaluation#scientific critique#research assessment
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Yassire1/icath-article --skill peer-review-yassire1
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: peer-review
Source: https://github.com/Yassire1/icath-article/tree/main/.opencode/skills/peer-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Yassire1/icath-article --skill peer-review-yassire1

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill addresses the challenge of conducting comprehensive and objective peer reviews of scientific manuscripts by providing a structured, detailed checklist aligned with discipline-specific guidelines.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured Evaluation: Guides reviewers through initial assessments, section-by-section analysis, and methodological critique.
  • Detailed Feedback: Facilitates identification of major and minor issues, with actionable suggestions.
  • Presentation Review: Special procedures for evaluating visual materials, such as slide decks, via image conversion and analysis.
  • Use Case: A reviewer examining a new clinical trial manuscript can systematically assess methodology, statistical validity, reproducibility, and ethical compliance, ensuring thorough and fair feedback.

Quick Start

Analyze a submitted manuscript, first by summarizing key points and then systematically reviewing each section with the provided checklists and guidelines.

Frequently Asked Questions about peer-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I conduct a structured peer review for a scientific manuscript?▼

Evaluate scientific manuscripts by summarizing key points first, then systematically reviewing methodology, data integrity, statistical validity, and ethical compliance using structured checklists to ensure thorough and fair feedback.

What should be included in a manuscript evaluation for research assessment?▼

A comprehensive manuscript evaluation includes initial assessments, section-by-section analysis, methodological critique, identification of major and minor issues, and actionable suggestions for improvement.

Can I use a peer review checklist for assessing visual materials like slide decks?▼

Yes, visual materials like slide decks can be evaluated using special procedures that involve converting images and analyzing them to provide structured critique and feedback.

Does this peer review process work for clinical trial manuscripts across different disciplines?▼

Yes, the peer review process is designed to be suitable across disciplines and manuscript types, allowing reviewers to systematically assess methodology, statistical validity, reproducibility, and ethical compliance for clinical trials.

How do I identify major and minor issues during scientific critique?▼

Facilitate identification of major and minor issues during scientific critique by following the structured evaluation checklists that guide reviewers through detailed feedback and actionable suggestions.

Related Skills

Explore More Content & Communication Skills→
iTzFaisaliTzFaisal
1

pptx

Read, edit, and generate PPTX slide decks from templates and data sources.

Community
Advanced
AperivueAperivue
243

self-review

Generate anticipated reviewer comments with severity framing for manuscript submissions.

Official
Advanced
Nobody-CreaterNobody-Creater

reference-verification

Verify citation support and apply reference styles to academic manuscripts.

Community
Advanced
travisjneumantravisjneuman
88

statistics-verifier

Verify statistical claims by auditing methodology, significance testing, and bias.

Community
Advanced