peer-review

Evaluate scientific manuscripts and grant proposals using structured review criteria.

1|1|Updated Mar 13, 2026

Search Tags:#scientific writing #grant review #presentation review #peer review #research integrity #manuscript evaluation #reporting standards

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/youyinnn/skills-collection --skill peer-review-youyinnn

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: peer-review
Source: https://github.com/youyinnn/skills-collection/tree/main/plugins/paper-writing-and-submission/skills/peer-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/youyinnn/skills-collection --skill peer-review-youyinnn

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a structured framework for conducting thorough and constructive peer reviews of scientific manuscripts and grant proposals, ensuring critical evaluation of methodology, statistics, and reporting.

Core Features & Use Cases

Systematic Evaluation: Guides users through a detailed, section-by-section review process.
Rigor Assessment: Focuses on methodological soundness, statistical validity, and reproducibility.
Reporting Standards: Checks compliance with discipline-specific guidelines (e.g., CONSORT, STROBE).
Constructive Feedback: Helps generate actionable feedback for authors.
Presentation Review: Includes a specialized workflow for evaluating slide decks and presentations.
Use Case: A journal editor can use this Skill to guide a reviewer in assessing a submitted research paper, ensuring all critical aspects are covered before publication.

Quick Start

Use the peer-review skill to evaluate the manuscript located at '/path/to/manuscript.pdf'.

Frequently Asked Questions about peer-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I conduct a structured peer review of a scientific manuscript?▼

To conduct structured peer review, use a systematic checklist evaluating methodology, statistical rigor, and reproducibility. This skill guides section-by-section reviews and generates constructive feedback for authors.

Can I check if a manuscript complies with reporting standards like CONSORT or STROBE?▼

Yes, manuscript compliance with reporting standards like CONSORT or STROBE can be checked. The skill evaluates discipline-specific guidelines to ensure research meets critical reporting requirements.

What is the best way to evaluate the methodology and statistical validity of a grant proposal?▼

Evaluating methodology and statistical validity in grant proposals involves assessing methodological soundness and reproducibility. This skill provides workflows to check research integrity and rigor for funding decisions.

Does this peer review process work for evaluating slide decks and presentations?▼

Yes, the peer review process works for slide decks and presentations. A specialized workflow evaluates presentation content and structure alongside traditional manuscript and grant review capabilities.

How do I generate actionable feedback for authors after reviewing a research paper?▼

Generating actionable feedback requires assessing writing quality, ethical considerations, and reproducibility. This skill formulates constructive feedback by evaluating manuscripts against established criteria and common issues.