peer-review

Evaluate scientific manuscripts and presentations with structured peer review checklists.

Updated Aug 27, 2026

Search Tags:#scientific writing #presentation review #peer review #research integrity #manuscript evaluation #statistical review

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/Zehong-Wang/Kosmos --skill peer-review-zehong-wang

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: peer-review
Source: https://github.com/Zehong-Wang/Kosmos/tree/main/kosmos-reference/kosmos-claude-scientific-writer/.claude/skills/peer-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Zehong-Wang/Kosmos --skill peer-review-zehong-wang

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a systematic framework and detailed checklist to conduct thorough, constructive, and objective peer reviews of scientific manuscripts and presentations, ensuring high standards of research integrity and communication.

Core Features & Use Cases

Comprehensive Evaluation: Assesses methodology, statistics, reproducibility, ethics, and writing quality.
Structured Feedback: Generates actionable reports with prioritized major and minor comments.
Specialized Guidance: Includes specific workflows for presentations, ensuring visual clarity and readability.
Use Case: A journal editor can use this Skill to guide reviewers in evaluating a submitted manuscript, ensuring all critical aspects are covered consistently and rigorously.

Quick Start

Use the peer-review skill to evaluate the attached manuscript draft, focusing on methodological soundness and statistical rigor.

Frequently Asked Questions about peer-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I conduct a systematic peer review of a scientific manuscript?▼

Peer review requires a systematic framework that evaluates methodology, statistics, reproducibility, ethics, and writing quality. This Skill provides detailed checklists and workflows to ensure comprehensive and objective manuscript evaluation, generating structured feedback with prioritized major and minor comments.

What is the best way to evaluate research integrity and statistical rigor in a submitted paper?▼

Evaluating statistical rigor involves checking the methodology, design, and reproducibility of the research. This Skill assesses these aspects along with ethics and reporting standards, offering structured guidance for constructive criticism to elevate scientific rigor and clarity.

Can I review scientific presentation slide decks for visual clarity and readability?▼

Yes, reviewing presentation slide decks is supported through specific workflows that require image-based inspection. This Skill evaluates presentations across disciplines, ensuring visual clarity and readability while maintaining the same comprehensive standards used for manuscript evaluation.

Does this manuscript evaluation process provide structured feedback for journal editors?▼

Yes, manuscript evaluation generates actionable reports with prioritized major and minor comments. A journal editor can use this Skill to guide reviewers in evaluating submitted manuscripts, ensuring all critical aspects are covered consistently and rigorously across different disciplines.

What should I check for when reviewing figure integrity and reporting standards in peer review?▼

When reviewing figure integrity and reporting standards, you should check methodology, design, reproducibility, and ethics. This Skill includes detailed checklists to ensure comprehensive and objective evaluation of these elements, providing structured feedback for constructive criticism.