pelizzai-debugging

Diagnose software defects through evidence-based hypothesis testing and reversible containment.

Updated Jun 26, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/rpelizza/PelizzAI --skill pelizzai-debugging
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: pelizzai-debugging
Source: https://github.com/rpelizza/PelizzAI/tree/main/.agents/skills/pelizzai-debugging
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/rpelizza/PelizzAI --skill pelizzai-debugging

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This skill provides a rigorous, structured framework for diagnosing and fixing software bugs, preventing common pitfalls like guessing, thrashing, or applying ineffective fixes.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Triage and Classification: Automatically categorizes issues into direct causes, uncertain deterministic bugs, flaky failures, or incidents with active damage.
  • Evidence-Based Resolution: Enforces the creation of a minimal, red-capable oracle to prove the symptom before attempting any fix.
  • Safety Guardrails: Mandates reversible containment for active incidents and prevents unauthorized repository mutations through a strict branching and confirmation gate.

Quick Start

Use the pelizzai-debugging skill to investigate the reported test failure in the authentication module and propose a fix based on the observed stack trace.

Frequently Asked Questions about pelizzai-debugging

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
What is systematic evidence-based debugging for software incidents?

Evidence-based debugging is a structured diagnostic workflow that classifies software defects and enforces hypothesis testing with minimal red-capable proof before attempting any fix.

How do I fix flaky test failures without guessing or thrashing?

To fix flaky failures, use a structured triage process that categorizes the issue, builds a minimal reproduction oracle to prove the symptom, and validates proportional code changes.

How do I triage active production incidents with ongoing damage?

Triage active incidents by applying reversible containment to stop the bleeding immediately, then follow evidence-based hypothesis testing before deploying any permanent resolution.

What is the best way to resolve uncertain deterministic bugs across diverse environments?

The best way to resolve deterministic bugs is enforcing a structured diagnostic workflow that requires creating a minimal, red-capable oracle to prove the symptom before proposing a fix.

Can I apply automated root cause analysis without unauthorized repository mutations?

Yes, automated root cause analysis can prevent unauthorized mutations by enforcing a strict branching strategy and confirmation gate before any reversible containment or code changes are applied.

Why do my software fixes fail to resolve the original defect?

Software fixes fail when they bypass evidence-based hypothesis testing; a structured framework requires proving the symptom with a minimal reproduction oracle to ensure verifiable resolution.