perform-review

Automate multi-perspective code reviews from tech lead, product manager, and QA personas.

1|Updated Mar 8, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/gjalla/gjalla-plugin --skill perform-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: perform-review
Source: https://github.com/gjalla/gjalla-plugin/tree/main/claude/skills/perform-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/gjalla/gjalla-plugin --skill perform-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Three-perspective code review from Senior Tech Lead, Product Manager, and QA Engineer. Use this skill when the user wants to be sure that their feature is complete, high quality, and bug free. Triggers when the user says things like "review this code", "is this done", "is this production ready", or any request for substantive code review beyond. If the user wants both cleanup and review, use prepare-for-review first. Also triggers when you are reviewing your own implementation to ensure completeness before reporting that you're done.

Core Features & Use Cases

Review the implementation through three expert lenses. Output is a unified checklist where each item is tagged with the persona that raised it: [TL], [PM], or [QA].

Quick Start

Propose a concrete, three-perspective review of the provided change by running through TL, PM, and QA checks and returning a unified checklist.

Frequently Asked Questions about perform-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I run a multi-perspective code review for new features?

Multi-perspective code review evaluates new features by applying checks from Senior Tech Lead, Product Manager, and QA Engineer personas. It generates a unified checklist where each item is tagged by the persona that raised it.

What is the best way to verify feature readiness before production deployment?

Feature readiness verification uses a three-perspective review process to validate completeness, quality, and bug-free delivery. It loads team rules and architecture to output a tagged checklist confirming production readiness.

Can I review my own code implementation for completeness before reporting done?

Reviewing your own implementation for completeness is supported by running through TL, PM, and QA checks. This ensures your code meets feature requirements and quality standards before you report being done.

How do I clean up code before running a quality assurance review?

To clean up code before a quality assurance review, use the prepare-for-review prompt for cleanup. Following this, the review process applies architecture and capability checks to output a unified checklist.

Does multi-perspective code review work for API changes and refactors?

Multi-perspective code review applies to API changes and refactors across codebases. It validates feature readiness by loading team rules and architecture to produce a unified, persona-tagged checklist.

When do I need a three-perspective code review checklist?

You need a three-perspective code review checklist when reviewing substantial code changes to ensure high quality and bug-free delivery. It applies when validating new features, API changes, or refactors across codebases.